Were you better off in 2007

Anonymous wrote:Who says, "give me a good reason why I should vote for (either candidate)".

Serious question.

I would seriously question the intellectual capabilities of anyone incapable of making a decision as to which candidate to vote for in the face of the stark difference in the candidates. I believe anyone needing a good reason to make their choice in this years election must exist in a vacuum, be incapable of reading, or be totally deaf. I'm more concerned that mentally defectives like this are entitled to vote

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Personally, I think it's useful to know the top three policy proposals of the guy you're going to vote for and the guy you're not inclined to vote for. Just so you know why you're making your choice.

Unfortunately, Romney doesn't have three policy proposals to evaluate.

Au contraire, he has three proposals for EVERY policy: The one he did in MA, the one he will repeal, and the one he will replace it with....

Oh wait, make that two policy proposals: the one he did in MA and the one he will repeal. I don't think he has gotten to replace yet....

No wait a minute, it appears that the ones he will repeal are the same as the ones he did in MA. So he has one proposal. And he will repeal it.

Anonymous wrote:Couple of houses around me have ron paul signs in the yards. Like...really????

At least they have integrity.

Anonymous wrote:Couple of houses around me have ron paul signs in the yards. Like...really????

Happy to hear this!

Couple of houses around me have ron paul signs in the yards. Like...really????

Anonymous wrote:Personally, I think it's useful to know the top three policy proposals of the guy you're going to vote for and the guy you're not inclined to vote for. Just so you know why you're making your choice.

Unfortunately, Romney doesn't have three policy proposals to evaluate.

Anonymous wrote:I tell them not to vote for any candidate who smells horrible. But they usually already know not to.

Yeah, Romney might have horseshit on his shoe.

Personally, I think it's useful to know the top three policy proposals of the guy you're going to vote for and the guy you're not inclined to vote for. Just so you know why you're making your choice.

If someone is apathetic, I would recommend for them to pick one issue that's most important to them, and then vote on that. If they ask me why I'm voting for my candidate, I would tell them. But I don't really try to convince anyone. I wouldn't want someone trying to convince me.

What's important to you and what do you think the President can actually do about that? (besides turning the knob in the Oval Office that adjusts the Dow or the price of oil)

Anonymous wrote:I tell them not to vote for any candidate who smells horrible. But they usually already know not to.

Is it even possible for you to be serious? For like 5 minutes? Panty Sniffer.

I tell them not to vote for any candidate who smells horrible. But they usually already know not to.

I say "what is most important to you?" and go from there. The only way to persuade an independent is to understand where they are coming from. Sorry if that's not the kind of answer you are looking for, but independents don't like anyone making assumptions about them.

Who says, "give me a good reason why I should vote for (either candidate)".

Serious question.