Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this is worse than valrie plame. she wasn't even active and everybody knew who leaked it. this event has already gotten allies killed and imprisoned. it is current and effects our security as well as our relationship with allies. valarie plame was an attention hound who had zero relevance to national security.

+1 she was an attention whore, no one honestly could believe her to be a spy

The court did when it convicted Scooter Libby of outing a spy. So apparently many people can honestly believe her to be a spy.

Why is every female target of the Republicans some form of "whore"?

That's not what Scooter Libby was convicted for. He didn't out her.

cheney

Anonymous wrote:...and this was going to be the most transparent presidency...

Still may be compared to Bush. Remember when Chaney declared that as VP he is not part of the Executive Branch of government, in order to evade the presidential record keeping laws?

Anyway if transparency is what you want, I would take a guy who selected a Republican to investigate him, over Romney: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/06/us-usa-campaign-romney-computers-idUSTRE7B500X20111206 Seriously??! The only thing transparent about Romney is his ambition.

...and this was going to be the most transparent presidency...

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
this is worse than valrie plame. she wasn't even active and everybody knew who leaked it. this event has already gotten allies killed and imprisoned. it is current and effects our security as well as our relationship with allies. valarie plame was an attention hound who had zero relevance to national security.



What could be worse than using phony evidence to justify war in Iraq. Her husband debunked Bush's lies a neo con Richard Arnitrage got even with her husband Joe Wilson for telling the truth
How many died in Iraq ??? You dare devalue the lives of our service Mem who died for Bush's phony war

Anonymous wrote:

People got killed when plame was outed. Blowing her cover also compromised other assets.

...and Obama is going to win in a landside and Wisconsin was a big win for the Democrats. Things must be getting a little bit wiggly out there in unicorn land.

The total number of people who got killed or imprisoned when Plame was outed is zero. Please provide a credible news source that shows otherwise. I won't be holding my breath...

I'll cite the same source as 13:37.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this is worse than valrie plame. she wasn't even active and everybody knew who leaked it. this event has already gotten allies killed and imprisoned. it is current and effects our security as well as our relationship with allies. valarie plame was an attention hound who had zero relevance to national security.

+1 she was an attention whore, no one honestly could believe her to be a spy

The court did when it convicted Scooter Libby of outing a spy. So apparently many people can honestly believe her to be a spy.

Why is every female target of the Republicans some form of "whore"?

Anonymous wrote:this is worse than valrie plame. she wasn't even active and everybody knew who leaked it. this event has already gotten allies killed and imprisoned. it is current and effects our security as well as our relationship with allies. valarie plame was an attention hound who had zero relevance to national security.

+1 she was an attention whore, no one honestly could believe her to be a spy

People got killed when plame was outed. Blowing her cover also compromised other assets.

...and Obama is going to win in a landside and Wisconsin was a big win for the Democrats. Things must be getting a little bit wiggly out there in unicorn land.

The total number of people who got killed or imprisoned when Plame was outed is zero. Please provide a credible news source that shows otherwise. I won't be holding my breath...

Anonymous wrote:What is Obama hiding? Why is he insisting on having his own political appointees investigate the matter?

"Obama would not agree to an investigation by an independent counsel, Carney said."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/07/politics/white-house...politics+%28RSS%3A+Politics%29

Obama has Holder assign investigators
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/08/politics/white-house-leaks/index.html

Apparently you cannot read. Because the third sentence of the link your provided reads:

Holder assigned U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ronald C. Machen Jr., a Democratic appointee, and U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein, a holdover GOP appointee, to lead the investigations.

There, problem solved. Topic FAIL

Anonymous wrote:this is worse than valrie plame. she wasn't even active and everybody knew who leaked it. this event has already gotten allies killed and imprisoned. it is current and effects our security as well as our relationship with allies. valarie plame was an attention hound who had zero relevance to national security.

People got killed when plame was outed. Blowing her cover also compromised other assets.

Anonymous wrote:this is worse than valrie plame. she wasn't even active and everybody knew who leaked it. this event has already gotten allies killed and imprisoned. it is current and effects our security as well as our relationship with allies. valarie plame was an attention hound who had zero relevance to national security.

Okay, I guess we make legal decisions based on political ideology these days. Whatever, not really worth discussing it with you if this is your attitude.

this is worse than valrie plame. she wasn't even active and everybody knew who leaked it. this event has already gotten allies killed and imprisoned. it is current and effects our security as well as our relationship with allies. valarie plame was an attention hound who had zero relevance to national security.

Isn't this exactly the same thing that happened for the Valerie Plame leak investigation? There wasn't an independent counsel appointed. Rather, Patrick Fitzgerald -- who was a US Attorney at the time -- was appointed to investigate.

Do you think Obama should be held to a higher standard then Bush?

What is Obama hiding? Why is he insisting on having his own political appointees investigate the matter?

"Obama would not agree to an investigation by an independent counsel, Carney said."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/07/politics/white-house...politics+%28RSS%3A+Politics%29

Obama has Holder assign investigators
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/08/politics/white-house-leaks/index.html