Anonymous wrote:up to 12 months leave.
50% pay for first 6 months, then 25% pay for up to 6 more.
applies to employers with 75 or more employees if employed for at least 1 year. for those not qualified, federal government pays 25% salary for up to 12 months, maxing out at $1,000/month. Unemployed people get paid zero.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If we could completely change the FMLA system in the U.S. what do you think is reasonable?
Personally, I think 12 weeks leave is on the short side of reasonable. My infant was sleeping longer stretches at 8 weeks and I was beginning to feel cabin-feverish.
I think we should have 16 weeks of paid leave. I think that is more than reasonable. If you don't use all 16 weeks at once, you can keep the leave for sick days.
I was blessed with a terrible sleeper. By 9 months we were at our wits end. I would have killed for more flexible hours or just 1 day off a week to catch up on sleep/errands, etc. Thus, I also think that in general there should be at least 2 weeks of sick leave on top of 2 weeks of vacation leave. Since having kids, I have ended up maxing out sick leave pretty much every year which takes away from much-needed vacation time.
In other words, I think if leave was more generous all around, it would relieve a lot of burden on new parents.
OP, when are you going to grow up and realize that your employer is not your parents, or your husband, or anyone else who has an obligation or even a need to make your life perfect? Quit your whining and be thankful that you have a job. No one cares about your terrible sleeper. They care about the job tha you are able to do for the company. If you can't hack it, you can't hack it. You should have thought about that before having kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If we could completely change the FMLA system in the U.S. what do you think is reasonable?
Personally, I think 12 weeks leave is on the short side of reasonable. My infant was sleeping longer stretches at 8 weeks and I was beginning to feel cabin-feverish.
I think we should have 16 weeks of paid leave. I think that is more than reasonable. If you don't use all 16 weeks at once, you can keep the leave for sick days.
I was blessed with a terrible sleeper. By 9 months we were at our wits end. I would have killed for more flexible hours or just 1 day off a week to catch up on sleep/errands, etc. Thus, I also think that in general there should be at least 2 weeks of sick leave on top of 2 weeks of vacation leave. Since having kids, I have ended up maxing out sick leave pretty much every year which takes away from much-needed vacation time.
In other words, I think if leave was more generous all around, it would relieve a lot of burden on new parents.
OP, when are you going to grow up and realize that your employer is not your parents, or your husband, or anyone else who has an obligation or even a need to make your life perfect? Quit your whining and be thankful that you have a job. No one cares about your terrible sleeper. They care about the job tha you are able to do for the company. If you can't hack it, you can't hack it. You should have thought about that before having kids.
Anonymous wrote:16 weeks sounds good. But under your plan, who pays for it, OP? Unfortunately many employers, especially small ones, just don't have the funds to pay someone who isn't working. If you expect the government to pay, are you comfortable with the higher taxes this would require, like in European countries? I'd like to have free healthcare and a new car too, but the money has to come from somewhere.
Honestly, I think that women who are of childbearing age, along with their partners, should sock away money long BEFORE getting pregnant to cover their leave. Obviously those who are truly low-income and won't be able to do this, and there should be provisions made to help in that situation, but I bet you 90% of the women on DCUM who are outraged about the lack of unpaid leave could have skipped a few dinners out or pairs of shoes along the way, and over time saved up 16 weeks of salary. That's what we did, and we are by NO means wealthy.
Anonymous wrote:If we could completely change the FMLA system in the U.S. what do you think is reasonable?
Personally, I think 12 weeks leave is on the short side of reasonable. My infant was sleeping longer stretches at 8 weeks and I was beginning to feel cabin-feverish.
I think we should have 16 weeks of paid leave. I think that is more than reasonable. If you don't use all 16 weeks at once, you can keep the leave for sick days.
I was blessed with a terrible sleeper. By 9 months we were at our wits end. I would have killed for more flexible hours or just 1 day off a week to catch up on sleep/errands, etc. Thus, I also think that in general there should be at least 2 weeks of sick leave on top of 2 weeks of vacation leave. Since having kids, I have ended up maxing out sick leave pretty much every year which takes away from much-needed vacation time.
In other words, I think if leave was more generous all around, it would relieve a lot of burden on new parents.