Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would have preferred larger class sizes, since there's not correlation between class size and achievement. But, I can live with the trailers. They don't bug me.
What makes you believe that? Some research? Or is it just your feeling?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're at Nottingham and we have a bunch of trailers. They are really actually kind of nice. It sucks that we lose some field space, but it is what it is. Personally, I'd rather have the trailers and smaller classes than the field and bigger classes.
The real issue, imho, is the cafeteria. It's only so big and there's no trailer for that so some of the kids are eating crazy early and some super late to be able to accomodate all the classes.
OP here:
You know, the cafeteria's the only thing that concerns me too.
Frankly, I would have preferred larger class sizes, since there's not correlation between class size and achievement. But, I can live with the trailers. They don't bug me.
It's like the Jamestown parents are looking for an excuse to take up arms. It's hilarious.
Frankly, I would have preferred larger class sizes, since there's not correlation between class size and achievement. But, I can live with the trailers. They don't bug me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're at Nottingham and we have a bunch of trailers. They are really actually kind of nice. It sucks that we lose some field space, but it is what it is. Personally, I'd rather have the trailers and smaller classes than the field and bigger classes.
The real issue, imho, is the cafeteria. It's only so big and there's no trailer for that so some of the kids are eating crazy early and some super late to be able to accomodate all the classes.
OP here:
You know, the cafeteria's the only thing that concerns me too.
Frankly, I would have preferred larger class sizes, since there's not correlation between class size and achievement. But, I can live with the trailers. They don't bug me.
It's like the Jamestown parents are looking for an excuse to take up arms. It's hilarious.
Anonymous wrote:We're at Nottingham and we have a bunch of trailers. They are really actually kind of nice. It sucks that we lose some field space, but it is what it is. Personally, I'd rather have the trailers and smaller classes than the field and bigger classes.
The real issue, imho, is the cafeteria. It's only so big and there's no trailer for that so some of the kids are eating crazy early and some super late to be able to accomodate all the classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reminds me of people who don't want sprawl and don't want density.
We're at Taylor, which also got some trailers. My kids are rapt.
1) Did they just arrive?
2) Are the parents/PTA apoplectic?
I swear, the outrage in the Jamestown district is making me laugh my ass off.
Anonymous wrote:The reminds me of people who don't want sprawl and don't want density.
We're at Taylor, which also got some trailers. My kids are rapt.
Anonymous wrote:Wait -- that parents are going to have to go to school in the trailers?!?!?!
Kids don't care. Teachers tend to like them.
Anonymous wrote:Curious Arlingtonian at non trailer (so far) school...do they put general classrooms in them, or are they for art, music, computer lab etc?