Anonymous wrote:I suspect a lot of the kids who are held back will just leave and go back to regular public school where they'll be socially promoted, receive differentiated instruction and out of the hair of the BASIS crowd that doesn't want anything but the best kids.
Most BASIS parents will be satisfied with this arrangement because it's better for their own kid, assuming it's not their own kid that's being held back.
Soon parents of marginal kids will know better than to send their kid somewhere where he/she will be humiliated and the intellectual segregation will be complete -- all on the tax payers dime and at no cost to parents of high-achieving kids.
Anonymous wrote:
The BASIS way serves the gifted kids while humiliating the ones who aren't so gifted. Still, they deserve an education that doesn't include using them as fodder for what is ultimately a scheme to get a private-school level education at public expense for parents who want to seem open-minded and unbiased, but really aren't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect a lot of the kids who are held back will just leave and go back to regular public school where they'll be socially promoted, receive differentiated instruction and out of the hair of the BASIS crowd that doesn't want anything but the best kids.
Most BASIS parents will be satisfied with this arrangement because it's better for their own kid, assuming it's not their own kid that's being held back.
Soon parents of marginal kids will know better than to send their kid somewhere where he/she will be humiliated and the intellectual segregation will be complete -- all on the tax payers dime and at no cost to parents of high-achieving kids.
I think you are absolutely right here. I think it's the way BASIS will ultimately achieve its goals in DC.
I do not like the characterization as something nefarious and equivalent to getting an exclusive education on the public dime. But I question what is wrong with having a school that addresses the needs of gifted (or adacademically advanced) kids and may not be a good fit for others. There are certainly schools that serve non-gifted kids well.
It is not about getting an advantage, it is about getting a child's needs met. Why are children who are gifted academically not entitled to having their needs met?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect a lot of the kids who are held back will just leave and go back to regular public school where they'll be socially promoted, receive differentiated instruction and out of the hair of the BASIS crowd that doesn't want anything but the best kids.
Most BASIS parents will be satisfied with this arrangement because it's better for their own kid, assuming it's not their own kid that's being held back.
Soon parents of marginal kids will know better than to send their kid somewhere where he/she will be humiliated and the intellectual segregation will be complete -- all on the tax payers dime and at no cost to parents of high-achieving kids.
I think you are absolutely right here. I think it's the way BASIS will ultimately achieve its goals in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to expose people to some thoughts (and research!) on the subject of retention, check out this article:
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar08/vol65/num06/Grade-Retention.aspx
Early and steady intervention is the key to success here. That may mean longer days and summer academic programs.
It is interesting that the studies seem focused exclusively on the educational and social impact of a policy of retention on the retained student. Perhaps I was not reading carefully, but I saw no mention of studies gauging the impact of a policy of retention on the retained student's peers.
When a student is retained, not only does he get a second chance to master the material he is having trouble with, but his peers get a chance to advance to more challenging material without the burden of devoting class time to remediation.
It is difficult enough to teach Algebra II to a group of students who have mastered Algebra I. It is much more difficult to do so if you must devote precious instruction time to repeating concepts from Algebra I or Pre-Algebra to those students who were promoted socially. How do you teach a child to factor polynomials when he has trouble factoring integers?
What do the children who mastered the material do while the teacher provides remedial instruction to those that did not? Twiddle their thumbs? Is that their reward for having studied hard the previous year?
Anonymous wrote:I suspect a lot of the kids who are held back will just leave and go back to regular public school where they'll be socially promoted, receive differentiated instruction and out of the hair of the BASIS crowd that doesn't want anything but the best kids.
Most BASIS parents will be satisfied with this arrangement because it's better for their own kid, assuming it's not their own kid that's being held back.
Soon parents of marginal kids will know better than to send their kid somewhere where he/she will be humiliated and the intellectual segregation will be complete -- all on the tax payers dime and at no cost to parents of high-achieving kids.
Anonymous wrote:Just to expose people to some thoughts (and research!) on the subject of retention, check out this article:
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar08/vol65/num06/Grade-Retention.aspx
Early and steady intervention is the key to success here. That may mean longer days and summer academic programs.