Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, my understanding is that the director indicated she ignored "normal" waitlist considerations. My colleague said she wasn't even supposed to be telling people that she got in, let alone what the director said. If the director was simply saying that "application date is not the only thing I consider, but I also consider other factors such as the child's age or other legitimate factors" I don't see why she would have felt it necessary to even give that warning. My take-away from the conversation was that the director picks and chooses who she lets in the center (based on what, I don't know -- who calls most? who brings her cookies when she tours the center?)
Thats pretty dangerous to say when you are dealing with Attorneys and their kids
But, she's already been investigated twice and cleared. Because she officially doesn't work for the government - there is nothing that DOJ is willing to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, my understanding is that the director indicated she ignored "normal" waitlist considerations. My colleague said she wasn't even supposed to be telling people that she got in, let alone what the director said. If the director was simply saying that "application date is not the only thing I consider, but I also consider other factors such as the child's age or other legitimate factors" I don't see why she would have felt it necessary to even give that warning. My take-away from the conversation was that the director picks and chooses who she lets in the center (based on what, I don't know -- who calls most? who brings her cookies when she tours the center?)
Thats pretty dangerous to say when you are dealing with Attorneys and their kids
Anonymous wrote:Yes, my understanding is that the director indicated she ignored "normal" waitlist considerations. My colleague said she wasn't even supposed to be telling people that she got in, let alone what the director said. If the director was simply saying that "application date is not the only thing I consider, but I also consider other factors such as the child's age or other legitimate factors" I don't see why she would have felt it necessary to even give that warning. My take-away from the conversation was that the director picks and chooses who she lets in the center (based on what, I don't know -- who calls most? who brings her cookies when she tours the center?)
Anonymous wrote:Yes, my understanding is that the director indicated she ignored "normal" waitlist considerations. My colleague said she wasn't even supposed to be telling people that she got in, let alone what the director said. If the director was simply saying that "application date is not the only thing I consider, but I also consider other factors such as the child's age or other legitimate factors" I don't see why she would have felt it necessary to even give that warning. My take-away from the conversation was that the director picks and chooses who she lets in the center (based on what, I don't know -- who calls most? who brings her cookies when she tours the center?)
Anonymous wrote:A colleague of mine recently was offered a spot here to start immediately. The director flat-out told her that she does not follow the waitlist, which is why my colleague got in. I found this really frustrating, especially since they happily take your waitlist application fee.
Anonymous wrote:It's hard to get into. But my coworkers who have their kids there love it.