Anonymous wrote:Oh honey, it is positively medieval in Richmond. In addition to the vaginal probing (which I cannot IMAGINE surviving challenge), there are a host of scary and downright mean-spirited pieces of legislation being bandied about.
They are attempting a "person hood amendment" of the type that Mississippi recently rejected. The Virginia House of Delegates overwhelmingly passed three bills: first bill (HB 62) eliminated medicaid funding of abortions in cases of gross and incapacitating fetal abnormalities; The second (HB 173) requires a person for whom English is a second language to pay for his/her own interpreter if convicted; The third bill (HB 189) permits a child-placing agency to discriminate against persons who want to adopt a child if that couple's sexual orientation is at odds with the belief of that agency. When I say overwhelmingly, I am talking about votes that are two to one.
Elections matter. Dark times for Virginia. History will not look kindly upon these folks.
I'd tread carefully here. While i agree that this is wrong, a loving home is a loving home, this was brought up to protect funding from catholic charities which provides a substantial amount to children needing adoption. I know it's hard to swallow but in this instance the children would suffer the most. It's so sad on so many levels.