Anonymous wrote:@TMWAU:
Exactly. It's as though the far-right cultural conservatives never got to watch Schoolhouse Rock growing up. Of course, when there's the slightest infringement on religious freedom (which is, of course, more of a 'choice' than sexual orientation) it's the end of the American Experiment.
Anonymous wrote:This is the most liberal 2 judges in the country and the original judge was gay, what did you expect. It was funny to see how confident they were to put it up for vote and when they didn't get the outcome desired they sued,so American, litigation over democracy
Anonymous wrote:I do not think your inference is correct.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is heading to the Supreme Court. Care to guess how it will come out there?!
I think it really depends upon how much of the case is a matter of interpreting state law, and how much is federal. I think they steered clear of equal protection claims under 14th and so a conservative court will have a hard time sticking its nose in this one.
I think they pretty much decided this entirely on the 14th amendment:
"The three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that a lower court judge correctly interpreted the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court precedents when he declared in 2010 that Proposition 8 – a response to an earlier state court decision that legalized gay marriage – was a violation of the civil rights of gays and lesbians."
I do not think your inference is correct.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is heading to the Supreme Court. Care to guess how it will come out there?!
I think it really depends upon how much of the case is a matter of interpreting state law, and how much is federal. I think they steered clear of equal protection claims under 14th and so a conservative court will have a hard time sticking its nose in this one.
I think they pretty much decided this entirely on the 14th amendment:
"The three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that a lower court judge correctly interpreted the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court precedents when he declared in 2010 that Proposition 8 – a response to an earlier state court decision that legalized gay marriage – was a violation of the civil rights of gays and lesbians."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is heading to the Supreme Court. Care to guess how it will come out there?!
I think it really depends upon how much of the case is a matter of interpreting state law, and how much is federal. I think they steered clear of equal protection claims under 14th and so a conservative court will have a hard time sticking its nose in this one.
Anonymous wrote:This is heading to the Supreme Court. Care to guess how it will come out there?!
Anonymous wrote:This is heading to the Supreme Court. Care to guess how it will come out there?!
A federal appeals panel in San Francisco ruled Tuesday that California’s Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, a decision that could lead to the Supreme Court’s consideration of the controversial social issue.
By a 2 to 1 vote, the panel overturned the proposition, which was approved by 52 percent of the state’s voters in 2008 and amended the state’s Constitution to limit marriage to a man and a woman.