Perry is credible? Did you just recently get back from an extended deployment on the space station?

Yes, everyone knows that these guys are losers. But the problem is that Romney is, too. He can't convince more than 25% of Iowans to support him. He can't poll higher than 25% in national republican polls.

And he's going to get dragged so far to the right, because he is a malleable person, that he will not win the middle.

Once again, GOP. Narrow your platform if you want to succeed. It can only be said so much. If you care about the economy, focus on that. If you care about the debt, focus on that. Going after gays and immigrants is not helping you. Abortion is not helping you. Big military adventures are not helping you. Holding up progress over needle exchanges in DC and for government funding of oil pipelines is not helping you. These are things that divide the country and narrow your appeal.

Anonymous wrote:Who? Who lost? Everybody won in that damn thing except perry bachmanN and huntsman. Was rove worried they would spring to life too?

I guarantee at everyone down to Gingrich just increased their fundraising as a result of their "loss"

Perry and Gingrich, who are the only two credible threats to Romney, lost.

Santorum and Paul will promptly fall by the wayside.

The good news for Rs is their team will probably win in November. The bad news for the country is the Rs will probably win in November.

Anonymous wrote:God lost. God had apparently told Bachmann, Cain, Perry and Santorum to run, and they all lost.

Looks like God has made a bit of a tit of himself.

God is calling Oerry back to Texas. They need him there. There is still wate to cut from the public schools and districts to gerrymander.

God lost. God had apparently told Bachmann, Cain, Perry and Santorum to run, and they all lost.

Looks like God has made a bit of a tit of himself.

Who? Who lost? Everybody won in that damn thing except perry bachmanN and huntsman. Was rove worried they would spring to life too?

I guarantee at everyone down to Gingrich just increased their fundraising as a result of their "loss"

And because he needed it.

Anonymous wrote:It's only January, but I think this one is a lock.

Karl Rove: "A Big Win for Romney in Iowa"

Only Karl could make a 25% plurality in a virtual 3 way tie into a "Big Win".

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203471004577140783488183486.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

I think Mr. Rove probably meant it's a big win for Romney because his credible opposition lost big-time.

It's only January, but I think this one is a lock.

Karl Rove: "A Big Win for Romney in Iowa"

Only Karl could make a 25% plurality in a virtual 3 way tie into a "Big Win".

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203471004577140783488183486.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories