Anonymous wrote:
I am arguing that (1) we cannot stop global warming unilaterally because our use of CO2 is not going to be the deciding factor. Even if cut emissions to ZERO the global emissions will still increase. So why kill ourselves economically?
(2) pragmatically, if there are negative consequences, it is going to be an engineering problem.
TheManWithAUsername wrote:Anonymous wrote:regardless, there is NOTHING you can do to stop the increase in CO2. even if the USA produced ZERO CO2, the total amount would still increase greatly because of the growth in the developing world. The atmosphere is connected.
So if the effects are material and they are negative, we will have to engineer our way around it.
I someone arguing that we shouldn't?
Or are you arguing that we shouldn't do anything about CO2 since we have an engineering problem anyway?
Anonymous wrote:regardless, there is NOTHING you can do to stop the increase in CO2. even if the USA produced ZERO CO2, the total amount would still increase greatly because of the growth in the developing world. The atmosphere is connected.
So if the effects are material and they are negative, we will have to engineer our way around it.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a conservative, and I don't believe that climate change is as dramatically caused by human activity as most greens say. That is not the same as thinking that there is no global warming. I believe there is global warming, but that it is primarily a natural cycle. And I don't think most "environmentalists" act like they think their individual actions make much of a difference either. (see Al Gore).
That article quotes one blogger saying he would support this study. Hardly the same as all conservatives agreeing to something.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think people deny climate change, they argue over what to do about it.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think people deny climate change, they argue over what to do about it. Unless we can stop China's and India's future growth it is all a moot point isn't it? So might as well worry about engineering solutions.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think people deny climate change, they argue over what to do about it. Unless we can stop China's and India's future growth it is all a moot point isn't it? So might as well worry about engineering solutions.