Anonymous wrote:
This silly point is beneath you, Mr. Steele. Cain was the CEO of a business and was on the board of the Kansas City federal reserve. (At least if Wikipedia is not lying to me.) Obama's experience before being President was nowhere close to as significant. Cain is vastly more prepared than Obama was.
jsteele wrote:takoma wrote:
I won't argue that, and to be fair to him, he has not been in politics before, so the fact that he is shaky on concepts like religious freedom for Muslims is more understandable from him than from either of them. I think he has caught on, and is unlikely to make that kind of mistake again. My point is just that he may now have reached a place where he won't be able to get away with such mistakes, so he had better buckle down and do some studying.
With regard to Cain's statement about Muslims, he eventually met with American Muslims and -- to his credit -- listened to what they had to say. Also, to his credit, he admitted making mistakes in his statements. It is very rare to hear any politician admit to being wrong. I don't expect Cain to be anything more than a flash in the pan. The primary process is not for amateurs and once real voting starts, he will disappear from the scene. But, if he were to become a serious contender, I'd look forward to hearing all of those who shriek endlessly about Obama's lack of experience being a problem reconcile Cain's lack of even basic experience in politics.
takoma wrote:
I won't argue that, and to be fair to him, he has not been in politics before, so the fact that he is shaky on concepts like religious freedom for Muslims is more understandable from him than from either of them. I think he has caught on, and is unlikely to make that kind of mistake again. My point is just that he may now have reached a place where he won't be able to get away with such mistakes, so he had better buckle down and do some studying.
Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Cain shares a problem with Palin and Bachmann. They all think everything is simple and can be solved by their "common sense" approach. I realize there are a few of those reading this who agree, and believe that those in charge are just stupid people who don't see the obvious. Perhaps they're right.
But there is also the alternate hypothesis that the problems are too complex for even smart people to always see the right answers. Or maybe even that there are no right answers.
I am am one who believes that those who think it's all simple believe they know all the answers because their goal is not actually to solve the real problems that face us, but to make decisions that will move the country in the direction they wish to go. Their answers are the "solutions" no matter what the problems are. (For example, Bush tax cuts to solve budget surplus or budget deficit.)
Guess you could call me a moderate Republican voter. Herman Cain may or may not be electable at this time, but he's got a LOT more on the ball than Palin and Bachmann. Very personable, relates to people well, a very good listener who doesn't usually get "rattled"," comes across as anything but flighty, and has been a successful businessman. Doesn't grope for words like Palin and Bachman.
takoma wrote:Cain shares a problem with Palin and Bachmann. They all think everything is simple and can be solved by their "common sense" approach. I realize there are a few of those reading this who agree, and believe that those in charge are just stupid people who don't see the obvious. Perhaps they're right.
But there is also the alternate hypothesis that the problems are too complex for even smart people to always see the right answers. Or maybe even that there are no right answers.
I am am one who believes that those who think it's all simple believe they know all the answers because their goal is not actually to solve the real problems that face us, but to make decisions that will move the country in the direction they wish to go. Their answers are the "solutions" no matter what the problems are. (For example, Bush tax cuts to solve budget surplus or budget deficit.)
Anonymous wrote:You shouldn't talk trash about this Mr. Steele. Perry blowing up is absolutely the best thing that could happen to the Republicans. That will force them to nominate the boring-but-electable Romney, whom Team Obama has no answer for, rather than the even-worse-Bush-clone Perry, who Obama might be able to beat because no one wants the third-term of G.W. Bush.
As for me, I'm now intrigued by Cain. Would be interesting to see him get more coverage. I know zero about him, but the resume looks interesting. Probably there is some fatal flaw to him, though.
Anonymous wrote:I love Herman Cain, I am so excited!!
takoma wrote:Perry not only lost, but got only about 40% of Cain's vote, and barely beat Romney, who was not even signed up! What's Texan for "toast"?