Anonymous wrote:Exactly. For decades conservative speakers were never invited to the liberal coastal elite schools. OP is well aware of that.
Anonymous wrote:Exactly. For decades conservative speakers were never invited to the liberal coastal elite schools. OP is well aware of that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Susan Ostermann's withdrawal from the Liu Institute directorship should concern anyone who values open debate at Notre Dame.
You don't have to agree with her views on abortion to recognize the problem: a professor faced intense pressure over her political beliefs and ultimately stepped aside. That's not a victory for dialogue—it's a warning sign.
A university should be a place where qualified scholars can lead despite disagreement, not where controversial viewpoints become disqualifying. If only certain opinions are acceptable in leadership, viewpoint diversity isn't thriving. It's collapsing.
Notre Dame can uphold its Catholic identity while still making room for intellectual disagreement. Those goals shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
https://www.ndsmcobserver.com/article/2026/02/breaking-ostermann-declines-liu-institute-directorship-following-backlash-over-abortion-advocacy
Now do this for Columbia, Harvard, NYU, SLACs, etc, etc, etc
Anonymous wrote:I am pro-choice, but I have no problem with a Catholic school requiring that its employees follow the tenets of the Catholic faith.
Anonymous wrote:Uh, you could have saved us all the Google search by saying she’s pro abortion, which is a non starter at Notre Dane. Moving on ….
Anonymous wrote:Susan Ostermann's withdrawal from the Liu Institute directorship should concern anyone who values open debate at Notre Dame.
You don't have to agree with her views on abortion to recognize the problem: a professor faced intense pressure over her political beliefs and ultimately stepped aside. That's not a victory for dialogue—it's a warning sign.
A university should be a place where qualified scholars can lead despite disagreement, not where controversial viewpoints become disqualifying. If only certain opinions are acceptable in leadership, viewpoint diversity isn't thriving. It's collapsing.
Notre Dame can uphold its Catholic identity while still making room for intellectual disagreement. Those goals shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
https://www.ndsmcobserver.com/article/2026/02/breaking-ostermann-declines-liu-institute-directorship-following-backlash-over-abortion-advocacy
Anonymous wrote:Susan Ostermann's withdrawal from the Liu Institute directorship should concern anyone who values open debate at Notre Dame.
You don't have to agree with her views on abortion to recognize the problem: a professor faced intense pressure over her political beliefs and ultimately stepped aside. That's not a victory for dialogue—it's a warning sign.
A university should be a place where qualified scholars can lead despite disagreement, not where controversial viewpoints become disqualifying. If only certain opinions are acceptable in leadership, viewpoint diversity isn't thriving. It's collapsing.
Notre Dame can uphold its Catholic identity while still making room for intellectual disagreement. Those goals shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
https://www.ndsmcobserver.com/article/2026/02/breaking-ostermann-declines-liu-institute-directorship-following-backlash-over-abortion-advocacy