Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on their role. Sets or implements policies for ERO? This person has probably broken the law numerous times. High level person in procurement? Likely no issues.
Kind of a mix actually. There are references to a number of controversial policies on the accomplishments section of their resume. The person would have been too low level to set those policies, but seems proud of their role in implementing them.
PP here and I would probably pass then if they were implementing policies that were clearly against the law. Also, they are apparently too stupid to try to hide the fact that they implemented said illegal policies.
Anonymous wrote:Hiring for a new role and got an application from someone who is currently high level (but not a political) at an immigration agency. Person started before current administration but has stayed until now. They are not a perfect match for this position, but somewhat close and I would interview if not for this black mark. Is this an indication of poor character to stay in that job for so long? Or should i assume extenuating circumstances?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on their role. Sets or implements policies for ERO? This person has probably broken the law numerous times. High level person in procurement? Likely no issues.
Kind of a mix actually. There are references to a number of controversial policies on the accomplishments section of their resume. The person would have been too low level to set those policies, but seems proud of their role in implementing them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on their role. Sets or implements policies for ERO? This person has probably broken the law numerous times. High level person in procurement? Likely no issues.
Kind of a mix actually. There are references to a number of controversial policies on the accomplishments section of their resume. The person would have been too low level to set those policies, but seems proud of their role in implementing them.
Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on their role. Sets or implements policies for ERO? This person has probably broken the law numerous times. High level person in procurement? Likely no issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good lord. Most people aren't capable of just walking away from a job on a political whim. They have to look for a job - like this person is doing! - with the requisite salary, location, and hours that works for their family. How do you know they didn't try to leave last January and every potential employer isn't doing the same as you?
That would work last June. It’s been 18 months now.
Anonymous wrote:Good lord. Most people aren't capable of just walking away from a job on a political whim. They have to look for a job - like this person is doing! - with the requisite salary, location, and hours that works for their family. How do you know they didn't try to leave last January and every potential employer isn't doing the same as you?