Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mantra on DCUM that APS teaches to the "lowest common denominator" is bullshit. The fact is, the APS elementary schools to which DCUM posters send their children are full of advantaged kids with high achieving and striving parents who don't need differentiation. Just look at the average test scores for these schools.
Every parent on DCUM thinks their child is the Christ Child and that the public schools--working with many, many kids and with limited budgets--owe it to them to take their kids away from the riff raff and provide them personally with a singularly gilded education. Nope, it doesn't work that way.
I agree with this. I have no idea why people say APS teaches to the lowest common denominator. It's just not true. I had two high achieving kids go through APS. Both were on the highest math track, both took multiple advanced classes (AP/DE) and were appropriately challenged. They had lots of peers with them at their level, so it's not like they were a one off. There are a lot of really smart kids in APS with involved invested parents. Also college outcomes for my kids and their friends and peers in APS were excellent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mantra on DCUM that APS teaches to the "lowest common denominator" is bullshit. The fact is, the APS elementary schools to which DCUM posters send their children are full of advantaged kids with high achieving and striving parents who don't need differentiation. Just look at the average test scores for these schools.
Every parent on DCUM thinks their child is the Christ Child and that the public schools--working with many, many kids and with limited budgets--owe it to them to take their kids away from the riff raff and provide them personally with a singularly gilded education. Nope, it doesn't work that way.
I know many, many privileged APS kids who get outside tutoring, particularly in math. It's rampant. Perhaps if there was differentiation available by APS all students, regardless of their ability to pay for outside tutoring, could have access to more challenging math.
I don't consider teachers offering content above the level of what is needed to pass the SOL to be inequitable. I also don't think that your child is especially special if they need more than grade-level SOL content to be challenged. That should be offered broadly as every grade at every school has kids who are capable of doing more challenging math.
By the way, some APS schools already do this. But some have taken the notion that challenging advanced students is inequitable and go out of their way to not offer anything to these students. That's not okay.
And for the record, APS math scores have been falling year after year. Test scores are lower than they were before Covid. APS really needs to do some self-reflection on what and how it's teaching. Math by iPad has not been a good addition. And the decrease in differentiation and more advanced content has not helped scores either.
Do you have very young kids? The challenge part takes care of itself starting in 6th with the different math tracks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mantra on DCUM that APS teaches to the "lowest common denominator" is bullshit. The fact is, the APS elementary schools to which DCUM posters send their children are full of advantaged kids with high achieving and striving parents who don't need differentiation. Just look at the average test scores for these schools.
Every parent on DCUM thinks their child is the Christ Child and that the public schools--working with many, many kids and with limited budgets--owe it to them to take their kids away from the riff raff and provide them personally with a singularly gilded education. Nope, it doesn't work that way.
I know many, many privileged APS kids who get outside tutoring, particularly in math. It's rampant. Perhaps if there was differentiation available by APS all students, regardless of their ability to pay for outside tutoring, could have access to more challenging math.
I don't consider teachers offering content above the level of what is needed to pass the SOL to be inequitable. I also don't think that your child is especially special if they need more than grade-level SOL content to be challenged. That should be offered broadly as every grade at every school has kids who are capable of doing more challenging math.
By the way, some APS schools already do this. But some have taken the notion that challenging advanced students is inequitable and go out of their way to not offer anything to these students. That's not okay.
And for the record, APS math scores have been falling year after year. Test scores are lower than they were before Covid. APS really needs to do some self-reflection on what and how it's teaching. Math by iPad has not been a good addition. And the decrease in differentiation and more advanced content has not helped scores either.
Anonymous wrote:The mantra on DCUM that APS teaches to the "lowest common denominator" is bullshit. The fact is, the APS elementary schools to which DCUM posters send their children are full of advantaged kids with high achieving and striving parents who don't need differentiation. Just look at the average test scores for these schools.
Every parent on DCUM thinks their child is the Christ Child and that the public schools--working with many, many kids and with limited budgets--owe it to them to take their kids away from the riff raff and provide them personally with a singularly gilded education. Nope, it doesn't work that way.
Anonymous wrote:The mantra on DCUM that APS teaches to the "lowest common denominator" is bullshit. The fact is, the APS elementary schools to which DCUM posters send their children are full of advantaged kids with high achieving and striving parents who don't need differentiation. Just look at the average test scores for these schools.
Every parent on DCUM thinks their child is the Christ Child and that the public schools--working with many, many kids and with limited budgets--owe it to them to take their kids away from the riff raff and provide them personally with a singularly gilded education. Nope, it doesn't work that way.
Anonymous wrote:I fully agree with this poster. The outcomes for advanced kids in these school systems are pretty similar. Look at the neighborhood you want to live in and go from there.
The major difference with Falls Church City is that the schools are much smaller. Once they get to high school in FCPS or APS, you're looking at huge schools -- Yorktown is one of the smaller ones with 2,200 kids. In contrast, Meridian in FCCPS has fewer than 1,000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If advanced academics are important to you APS is not the best choice.
Correct. If you're looking for teaching to the lowest common denominator type curriculum? APS is perfect.
There’s no meaningful difference in college outcomes between these choices. UVA admits about 10% of the class; their instas reflect one off HYP type admissions and a handful of T5-T10 depending on specific year. Bottom line: you serve gaining an advantage by choosing one over the other in the ultimate next round admission and colleges don’t see meaningful differences in the caliber of student coming from Rhee places. That being said, there are slight differences in pedagogy and school makeup and specific strengths (eg a really strong theater program or a really good lacrosse team). If your child has specific strengths then maybe these would be important to you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If advanced academics are important to you APS is not the best choice.
Correct. If you're looking for teaching to the lowest common denominator type curriculum? APS is perfect.
Anonymous wrote:If advanced academics are important to you APS is not the best choice.