Anonymous
Post 06/08/2026 06:43     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

Anonymous wrote:Op again.

For example, if every deceased person had a DNA profile available for comparison, investigators could potentially identify suspects who died before they were ever arrested or convicted. There have been numerous cold cases solved after comparing crime scene DNA to DNA obtained from a deceased suspect’s even forensic genealogy has solved cases recently.


Did we try the deceased suspect in court or just provide a summary judgment so the police could close the case and feel good about eventually "solving" the crime?
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2026 06:40     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks this is a good idea has a mid-aughts understanding of how DNA works. DNA science has evolved to the point where we can detect small amounts of DNA on basically everything. You are constantly leaving your DNA on surfaces, so the presence of a person's DNA at the scene of a crime isn't necessarily probative of anything.

I used to prosecute gun cases and we routinely DNA tested the guns. I can't recall a single instance where there was only one person's DNA on the gun. It was always a mixture.


Couldn't you just arrest them all and charge them all?
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2026 00:55     Subject: Re:Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

A tangential issue. There are warehouses full of rape kits with evidence that hasn't been tested for DNA matches. That's tens of thousands of American women who, unlike the majority of rape victims, came forward and endured the collection of evidence from their bodies. But because of lack of funding -- or just plain prosecutorial priority -- their cases go unsolved.
Anonymous
Post 06/07/2026 18:20     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

Anyone who thinks this is a good idea has a mid-aughts understanding of how DNA works. DNA science has evolved to the point where we can detect small amounts of DNA on basically everything. You are constantly leaving your DNA on surfaces, so the presence of a person's DNA at the scene of a crime isn't necessarily probative of anything.

I used to prosecute gun cases and we routinely DNA tested the guns. I can't recall a single instance where there was only one person's DNA on the gun. It was always a mixture.
Anonymous
Post 06/07/2026 18:13     Subject: Re:Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

19:00 answered your question. It’s unconstitutional. Your idea is a nonstarter.
Anonymous
Post 06/07/2026 18:13     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

Great use, however unconstitutional. Next
Anonymous
Post 06/07/2026 18:11     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

Op again.

For example, if every deceased person had a DNA profile available for comparison, investigators could potentially identify suspects who died before they were ever arrested or convicted. There have been numerous cold cases solved after comparing crime scene DNA to DNA obtained from a deceased suspect’s even forensic genealogy has solved cases recently.
Anonymous
Post 06/07/2026 18:10     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t dna collected during autopsy? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of mystery crimes where dna is found but not identified to a person because that person has never committed a crime before?


If my DNA is found at a crime scene, am I guilty?


Why was your skin or blood under the victim’s fingernails? Under what circumstances was that a commonplace occurrence for you both?
Anonymous
Post 06/07/2026 08:34     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

You watch too much television.
Anonymous
Post 06/07/2026 08:24     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

Because that’s not how DNA works
Anonymous
Post 06/06/2026 21:40     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t dna collected during autopsy? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of mystery crimes where dna is found but not identified to a person because that person has never committed a crime before?


If my DNA is found at a crime scene, am I guilty?
Anonymous
Post 06/06/2026 21:03     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

I’ll play - collect it at birth or at other biometric appointments
Anonymous
Post 06/06/2026 20:33     Subject: Re:Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

Privacy.
Anonymous
Post 06/06/2026 19:00     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

According to the US Constitution the government needs a warrant based on specific facts that implicate someone as a criminal before it is legal to execute a search. That’s why your idea is a non starter.
Anonymous
Post 06/06/2026 18:39     Subject: Why isn’t dna collected when people die? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of unsolved crimes?

Why isn’t dna collected during autopsy? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of mystery crimes where dna is found but not identified to a person because that person has never committed a crime before?