Anonymous wrote:Op again.
For example, if every deceased person had a DNA profile available for comparison, investigators could potentially identify suspects who died before they were ever arrested or convicted. There have been numerous cold cases solved after comparing crime scene DNA to DNA obtained from a deceased suspect’s even forensic genealogy has solved cases recently.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks this is a good idea has a mid-aughts understanding of how DNA works. DNA science has evolved to the point where we can detect small amounts of DNA on basically everything. You are constantly leaving your DNA on surfaces, so the presence of a person's DNA at the scene of a crime isn't necessarily probative of anything.
I used to prosecute gun cases and we routinely DNA tested the guns. I can't recall a single instance where there was only one person's DNA on the gun. It was always a mixture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t dna collected during autopsy? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of mystery crimes where dna is found but not identified to a person because that person has never committed a crime before?
If my DNA is found at a crime scene, am I guilty?
Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t dna collected during autopsy? Wouldn’t that solve a lot of mystery crimes where dna is found but not identified to a person because that person has never committed a crime before?