Anonymous wrote:Universities are going to do their best to work around the formal bans on affirmative action. See what happened in California after prop 209 was passed. Likely to not be as much of a benefit from trolling the depths of your family tree for a black ancestor, but it's still worth doing, if the goal is solely admissions.
Anonymous wrote:My child is applying to a professional program next year. I am aware of the lawsuit against Yale Medical School that was initiated because of supposed racial preferences. My child is mixed and in reality is more non-African than African. My child’s grades are very good (3.79) but not perfect.
I am wondering if people like my child are better off identifying as white. Theoretically, the schools would see such an applicant as a benefit to a defensive strategy. That is assuming that my child’s GPA would effectively lower the GPA of white students, but not harm the average for African American students.
Would this make my child look bad or unethical in any way?
There is also the possibility that my child’s GPA is higher than that of white applicants and this strategy backfires.
Anonymous wrote:How about checking all the boxes that he identifies with?
My European White and East Asian kids check both boxes. This is who they are, and they're proud of it. No lies necessary.
Anonymous wrote:How about checking all the boxes that he identifies with?
My European White and East Asian kids check both boxes. This is who they are, and they're proud of it. No lies necessary.