Anonymous
06/05/2026 15:55
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
Anonymous wrote:What Democrats voted for it?
And what Republicans voted against?
All republicans voted yes . Republicans voting records are public so are Dems
Davis, Gonzales and Perez where the Dems that voted with the pro birth sickos
Anonymous
06/05/2026 15:48
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
Anonymous wrote:Aid to women AND MEN.
Men can give birth too, OP. Please be more inclusive.
+1, sick of these maggats who share without thinking of who might be impacted by their violent rhetoric
Anonymous
06/05/2026 12:28
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
Anonymous wrote:Aid to women AND MEN.
Men can give birth too, OP. Please be more inclusive.
Please be less dumb.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 12:21
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
What Democrats voted for it?
And what Republicans voted against?
And what Republicans voted against?
Anonymous
06/05/2026 12:07
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
Aid to women AND MEN.
Men can give birth too, OP. Please be more inclusive.
Men can give birth too, OP. Please be more inclusive.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 11:16
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
At least they don’t claim “compassionate conservatism” or being “pro-family” anymore. They want to enable billionaires who rape children, and they’re barely even hiding that.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 09:46
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It not only reduces abortions but it also reduces the incidence of birth defects that are a lot more costly for society.
Jeez, this is not a 3rd world country. No one should go hungry. The government has money for bombing Iran, they can feed hungry babies.
And the same people complaining about the declining birth rate will turn around and say "they were irresponsible for getting pregnant if they couldn't afford it." Never mind food prices are soaring. Never mind making kids a luxury item will mean fewer children.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 09:41
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
Anonymous wrote:It not only reduces abortions but it also reduces the incidence of birth defects that are a lot more costly for society.
Jeez, this is not a 3rd world country. No one should go hungry. The government has money for bombing Iran, they can feed hungry babies.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 09:38
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
It not only reduces abortions but it also reduces the incidence of birth defects that are a lot more costly for society.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 09:37
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
Anonymous wrote:Trump has to cut WIC to pay for the bombs, arches, Kennedy center remodeling. Let them eat cake.[/quote
Don't forget the money he's just shoving into his own pockets.
My brother and his wife were students when my nephew was born, WIC really made a huge difference in their lives, it allowed them to have my nephew and finish their degrees.
Let's get real, if you're a right winger I'll lay it out, programs like WIC reduce abortions. A family who isn't worried that they can't feed their baby is more likely to have that baby.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 09:33
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
Trump has to cut WIC to pay for the bombs, arches, Kennedy center remodeling. Let them eat cake.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 09:19
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
Anonymous wrote:This is par for the course for Rs at this point, but I want to know what stupid Dems voted to cut *fruit and vegetables* for pregnant women and little kids.
Me too.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 08:53
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
So pro life of them.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 08:48
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
This is par for the course for Rs at this point, but I want to know what stupid Dems voted to cut *fruit and vegetables* for pregnant women and little kids.
Anonymous
06/05/2026 07:40
Subject: Psa-food aid for pregnant women proposed to be cut
Heads up if you depend on food aid from Women, infants and children-the fruit and vegetables benefit is proposed to be cut.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/04/house-bill-rolls-back-food-aid-pregnant-women-children/?utm_campaign=wp_the7&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F4742f60%2F6a22a9c51fe63242be218a3f%2F62122d12ae7e8a6b2f3d07a3%2F17%2F91%2F6a22a9c51fe63242be218a3f
House bill rolls back food aid for pregnant women, children
Millions of WIC recipients would have less money for fruits and vegetables under the legislation, which funds the Agriculture Department and other agencies.
As grocery prices continue to rise nationally, the House on Thursday passed an appropriations bill that would cut funding for a program that helps pregnant women and children purchase healthy foods.
By a vote of 213-210, the House passed an appropriations measure to fund the Agriculture Department among other agencies. The bill, which the Senate has yet to consider, aims to cut about 1.5 percent from overall federal agriculture spending in fiscal 2027, according to Republicans. Four House Democrats voted with Republicans to pass the measure, while five Republicans voted against it.
Under the legislation, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children — more commonly known as WIC — would lose $141 million in funding for fruit and vegetable benefits for the nearly 5.4 million children and pregnant and postpartum women enrolled, according to an estimate from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/04/house-bill-rolls-back-food-aid-pregnant-women-children/?utm_campaign=wp_the7&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F4742f60%2F6a22a9c51fe63242be218a3f%2F62122d12ae7e8a6b2f3d07a3%2F17%2F91%2F6a22a9c51fe63242be218a3f
House bill rolls back food aid for pregnant women, children
Millions of WIC recipients would have less money for fruits and vegetables under the legislation, which funds the Agriculture Department and other agencies.
As grocery prices continue to rise nationally, the House on Thursday passed an appropriations bill that would cut funding for a program that helps pregnant women and children purchase healthy foods.
By a vote of 213-210, the House passed an appropriations measure to fund the Agriculture Department among other agencies. The bill, which the Senate has yet to consider, aims to cut about 1.5 percent from overall federal agriculture spending in fiscal 2027, according to Republicans. Four House Democrats voted with Republicans to pass the measure, while five Republicans voted against it.
Under the legislation, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children — more commonly known as WIC — would lose $141 million in funding for fruit and vegetable benefits for the nearly 5.4 million children and pregnant and postpartum women enrolled, according to an estimate from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.