Anonymous wrote:My impression is that admissions officers at certain schools are so anti-AI that they's rather see something less polished because it will sound more "authentic."

Read essays - pay the fee to see a bunch of successful essays. The level of polish is astounding.

My impression is that admissions officers at certain schools are so anti-AI that they's rather see something less polished because it will sound more "authentic."

Which ones are we talking about?

Kolly? Kollegio? Esai? Esslo?

I feel like I've seen others too.

Like in many things, if you don't adapt, you will get left behind. I think some AI use is necessary to keep up with modern life, even in an education context.

They're okay. Good to use for a high-level edit

AI can be beneficial if used the right way. If they don't write for you (which I do not believe they do), then use them - especially if a counselor is too pricey

Yes - we did.
In at multiple T10/Ivies.

They don’t rewrite anything; only help with ideas for application these/narrative and positioning for activities.

Search here for old threads.

I agree with most points on the writing process where writing it by hand is very important to make sure that your voice is heard. But, my daughter has been using Kolly to grade her essay and it's giving some great feedback – way better than the consultant we paid $5k for...

Anonymous wrote:Sadly one of the potential great uses for AI is to teach kids how to write. Teachers give close to zero feedback now. The editorial and feedback process is one of the most effective ways to learn how to write.

Except that, due to AI, writing itself has become a useless skill.

Sadly one of the potential great uses for AI is to teach kids how to write. Teachers give close to zero feedback now. The editorial and feedback process is one of the most effective ways to learn how to write.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. They shouldn’t use them. Any of them.

How come? Some of us pay thousands for counselors to edit essays. As long as they aren't using these AI to write, what's wrong with it?

What other kids do isn’t my business or my problem. But I don’t want my kids cheating themselves out of learning how to read, write, reason, analyze. AI robs them of that.

It also destroys the environment, steals intellectual property, and hallucinates. It’s being pushed down our throats by the people who stand to make zillions by selling the tools and/or eliminate jobs using AI as an excuse.

Don’t use it. It’s bad.

I had advised DD to stay away from any AI to edit or work on essays. This includes grammarly. I have this fear that it increases AI detection and take away originality.

Anonymous wrote:No. They shouldn’t use them. Any of them.

How come? Some of us pay thousands for counselors to edit essays. As long as they aren't using these AI to write, what's wrong with it?

No. They shouldn’t use them. Any of them.

Keep seeing all these advertisements for sites like Kolly.ai, Esai.ai, etc.

What is everyone's thoughts on these sites? They advertise as "leveling the playing field" since counselors can be inaccessible for some, but are they ethical?