Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were in AAC. Take a look club. it is not Safe Sport certified anymore, and it shows with the treatment of their athletes.
???
AAC has a long history of not treating boys well in almost all their competition groups. They seem to not want to develop their male swimmers and give up on them. Someone told me in their top groups it is 70% women and 30% men which is an issue and not typical of a club.
I wonder if it the Huske effect. They had one Olympian who was a late bloomer by swimmer standards so they got her where she needed to be and the success was great and now they want to recreate it. But, in reality by not investing in their boys they are letting them fail. Boys keep growing through college so they should really be working with them. But they tend to focus on the early blooming boy and then he peaks out and who knows all the talent that they let slip through the cracks because of it.
How do they treat non-binary?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were in AAC. Take a look club. it is not Safe Sport certified anymore, and it shows with the treatment of their athletes.
???
AAC has a long history of not treating boys well in almost all their competition groups. They seem to not want to develop their male swimmers and give up on them. Someone told me in their top groups it is 70% women and 30% men which is an issue and not typical of a club.
I wonder if it the Huske effect. They had one Olympian who was a late bloomer by swimmer standards so they got her where she needed to be and the success was great and now they want to recreate it. But, in reality by not investing in their boys they are letting them fail. Boys keep growing through college so they should really be working with them. But they tend to focus on the early blooming boy and then he peaks out and who knows all the talent that they let slip through the cracks because of it.
Anonymous wrote:I have a HS swimmer and I have very little substantive interaction with their coach. What exactly are you trying to discuss with them that they are not responsive to? If you have a D1 prospect swimmer, I would say your options are limited to NCAP and AAC. If your kid isn’t looking swimming past HS, the range of options is larger.
Anonymous wrote:What about the current club is making you feel like it’s not a good fit? What does your kid want out of swimming, do they want to continue in college or are they looking to scale back?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were in AAC. Take a look club. it is not Safe Sport certified anymore, and it shows with the treatment of their athletes.
???
Anonymous wrote:Go somewhere the kids still have FUN. Swimming is not and should not be a full time job for high schoolers. They need lives outside of it.
Anonymous wrote:We were in AAC. Take a look club. it is not Safe Sport certified anymore, and it shows with the treatment of their athletes.
Anonymous wrote:We were in AAC. Take a look club. it is not Safe Sport certified anymore, and it shows with the treatment of their athletes.