Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has been said sooo many times, but it’s obvious that central office positions should be the top priority when making these cuts. Are some positions necessary? Yes. Are the majority? Absolutely not.
Central Office only has a few hundred positions even available to cut from. There's no way they can take all of the 850+ job cuts from there. Yes, they are wasteful, and they should probably cut more than the 30ish Central Office positions currently on the list, but they can probably feasibly only cut 100 or so more max, possibly less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the biggest categories are:
- Media assistants
- College and career navigators
- Social workers
- English composition assistants
- Pupil personnel workers
- EML therapeutic counselors
- Family engagement specialists
- Special education resource teachers
- Staff development teachers
- And 220 middle school teachers
Total of 850 employees being laid off
Oh no. The media assistant at my kids school does a lot. He also runs the 3D printing club
Anonymous wrote:This has been said sooo many times, but it’s obvious that central office positions should be the top priority when making these cuts. Are some positions necessary? Yes. Are the majority? Absolutely not.
Anonymous wrote:Looks like the biggest categories are:
- Media assistants
- College and career navigators
- Social workers
- English composition assistants
- Pupil personnel workers
- EML therapeutic counselors
- Family engagement specialists
- Special education resource teachers
- Staff development teachers
- And 220 middle school teachers
Total of 850 employees being laid off
Anonymous wrote:It's pretty much public: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OA8HANnsPlM7-xyvfma4H_0nRLQRYaKo/view
Anonymous wrote:Can someone share the list sent out today of which positions will be cut/which staff will be laid off, assuming the County Council vote goes the way it is expected to and MCPS has to fill a ~$100Mish hole?