Anonymous wrote:I disagree with everyone above. 25 APs is INCREDIBLY impressive. Very few kids can take that many APs and do well starting freshman year.
I am guessing the kid was weak in other areas. For top 10, we already know you need something very special and more individually driven.
This isn't surprising. Kid got into top 20 schools that are ok with more one-dimensional students like UCLA.
Anonymous wrote:Kid that took 25 APs in high school couldn’t crack top 10, but still got into UCLA.
https://youtu.be/MlTf-qxcY3k?si=FH7sakCHHqgeDH3X
It’s not only APs, everything else does matter.
Anonymous wrote:I disagree with everyone above. 25 APs is INCREDIBLY impressive. Very few kids can take that many APs and do well starting freshman year.
I am guessing the kid was weak in other areas. For top 10, we already know you need something very special and more individually driven.
This isn't surprising. Kid got into top 20 schools that are ok with more one-dimensional students like UCLA.
Anonymous wrote:Endless and pointless grinding does not impress T10 colleges.