Anonymous wrote:this is why they fought for the number 3000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if the colleges have enough money and can offer free tuition instead of paying a tax, the college chooses free tuition?
Why doesn't Harvard do this? It would have to curtail the 25% of students from the rich, private, Independent schools, but Harvard is about equity??
Harvard is too big. Law school, medical school, business school, etc
Anonymous wrote:So if the colleges have enough money and can offer free tuition instead of paying a tax, the college chooses free tuition?
Why doesn't Harvard do this? It would have to curtail the 25% of students from the rich, private, Independent schools, but Harvard is about equity??
Anonymous wrote:Only a school like Princeton could do this. Universities that don't pay as much attention to exclusivity and inaccessibility can't replicate this model.
Anonymous wrote:Brilliant and well-played. Curious how it'll work out for the other 10 or so schools hit with the endowment tax.
https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2026/05/princeton-news-adpol-university-spared-endowment-tax-financial-aid-millions-princo
According to the attendees, who were granted anonymity to speak about the closed-door event, Ciniglio stated that the number of tuition-paying students at the University was under the 3,000 threshold to qualify for the tax, in response to an audience question. This comes after a $44 million expansion of the financial aid program for the 2025–2026 academic year, which eliminated tuition for most families making less than $250,000 and followed previous aid increases.