Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCAP takes up so many instructional days. 2 days each for Math, English, Social Studies...for a worthless exam whose results come 6-12 months later that MCPS doesn't use for anything.
All the decisions for CES, magnets etc. are made using the MAP test scores. MCAP is worthless.
Except now MCAP is supposed to be one of the four items (with CogAT, MAP-M & Curricular Assessments) used for determining Math acceleration, possibly the only one used for course advancement (grade skipping in a subject relying on scoring 4 on MCAP for the grade to be skipped), and the only measure on which the system's success in this field will be judged. How they are going to utilize it effectively for those with its timing and the months-long reporting lag is a mystery.
The MCAP distributions are crazy. In my kids' grade reports, less than 5% are getting a 4 in some subjects. So if getting a 4 is the determinant for getting accelerated math, problem solved--very few will have 4s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCAP takes up so many instructional days. 2 days each for Math, English, Social Studies...for a worthless exam whose results come 6-12 months later that MCPS doesn't use for anything.
All the decisions for CES, magnets etc. are made using the MAP test scores. MCAP is worthless.
Except now MCAP is supposed to be one of the four items (with CogAT, MAP-M & Curricular Assessments) used for determining Math acceleration, possibly the only one used for course advancement (grade skipping in a subject relying on scoring 4 on MCAP for the grade to be skipped), and the only measure on which the system's success in this field will be judged. How they are going to utilize it effectively for those with its timing and the months-long reporting lag is a mystery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCAP takes up so many instructional days. 2 days each for Math, English, Social Studies...for a worthless exam whose results come 6-12 months later that MCPS doesn't use for anything.
All the decisions for CES, magnets etc. are made using the MAP test scores. MCAP is worthless.
Except now MCAP is supposed to be one of the four items (with CogAT, MAP-M & Curricular Assessments) used for determining Math acceleration, possibly the only one used for course advancement (grade skipping in a subject relying on scoring 4 on MCAP for the grade to be skipped), and the only measure on which the system's success in this field will be judged. How they are going to utilize it effectively for those with its timing and the months-long reporting lag is a mystery.
Anonymous wrote:MCAP takes up so many instructional days. 2 days each for Math, English, Social Studies...for a worthless exam whose results come 6-12 months later that MCPS doesn't use for anything.
All the decisions for CES, magnets etc. are made using the MAP test scores. MCAP is worthless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adaptive testing is now becoming the gold standard. It's great. I support the changes if it means MCAP becomes adaptive.
An adaptive test *after the course is over* is not helpful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was always half-baked. They need to just use a standard national test that doesn't require years of debugging.
+1
Anonymous wrote:It was always half-baked. They need to just use a standard national test that doesn't require years of debugging.
Anonymous wrote:It was always half-baked. They need to just use a standard national test that doesn't require years of debugging.
Anonymous wrote:Adaptive testing is now becoming the gold standard. It's great. I support the changes if it means MCAP becomes adaptive.
“We are strengthening the value of the assessment program for Maryland students,” said Dr. Carey M. Wright, State Superintendent of Schools. “This opportunity to thoughtfully redesign our assessment program with community input allows Maryland to better measure student performance and academic growth.”
* Improve technical quality and validity by adopting assessments that meet current psychometric standards, including the transition to multi-stage adaptive testing to better measure student performance across the full range of achievement.
* Increase equity and accessibility through enhanced accommodation delivery, ensuring more consistent, timely, and appropriate access for students with disabilities and multilingual learners.
* Enhance instructional usefulness by incorporating an optional interim assessment program that provides educators with actionable data to inform instruction throughout the school year.
* Expand and strengthen assessment content by augmenting the existing MSDE item bank to ensure an adequate number of questions at all difficulty levels, allowing for greater flexibility and an increased number of released items.
* Improve efficiency and coherence by consolidating multiple vendors into an integrated assessment platform, reducing complexity and improving system alignment.