Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Larlo did nothing wrong. Larla needs to learn how to communicate better and understand the game better. It is possible for a guy to fall for you hard after a few dates and be exclusive without having to discuss it - but Larla would have known if that was the case. If you are still just seeing each other once a week, he is not that into you (yet). Also if Larla reflects, she is probably operating more out of pride than actually assessing whether she likes Larlo.
Larla says it’s not about falling for someone that early on, or pride. It’s more that a lack of disclosure shows a difference in values, as she wouldn’t sleep with two men simultaneously, or would be upfront about as as she believes it’s important to be upfront so the other person can make a decision.
Anonymous wrote:Larlo did nothing wrong. Larla needs to learn how to communicate better and understand the game better. It is possible for a guy to fall for you hard after a few dates and be exclusive without having to discuss it - but Larla would have known if that was the case. If you are still just seeing each other once a week, he is not that into you (yet). Also if Larla reflects, she is probably operating more out of pride than actually assessing whether she likes Larlo.
Anonymous wrote:Larla should work on her communication skills and stop expecting people to read her mind. If Larla expects Larlo to be exclusively dating her, she should have a conversation with him where she explicitly addresses that issue. Larla is not wrong to feel icked out by Larlo's promiscuity . . . she need not accept that . . . but she is wrong to expect him to intuit her expectations about exclusivity.
Anonymous wrote:Larla and Larlo have been dating for 5 weeks, seeing each other about once a week. They’ve slept together 3 times.
The last time they met up (which was early afternoon), Larlo mentioned he had plans that evening. Larla asked if it was a date, Larlo said yes. Larla asked if Larlo was sleeping with her as well, Larlo said yes.
Larla broke things off because while he didn’t directly lie, he failed to communicate he was sleeping with someone else. Larlo maintains that he did nothing wrong since they hadn’t talked about being exclusive, and was still figuring out which woman he wanted to commit to, but has told Larla he will stop seeing the other woman and exclusively date her.
Larla is debating it, but is leaning towards no, because she believes he should have been upfront and honest about sleeping with someone else even if they weren’t exclusive because of the emotional and STD risks. Dating others would have been fine, sleeping with them, not okay. Also, felt very gross that Larlo literally slept with her that afternoon and the other woman that evening.
Who is right/wrong here?