Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the next six months, you present all of her work as having been done by a male colleague and at the end of the six months you break it to him.
Also, you can help her find a better team.
You can also report it to his supervisor.
You can document everything he does, everything he says, and you can report it to HR.
These are multiple ways that you can deal with this.
Op - going above your boss to their supervisor is pretty big deal (and in this case the supervisor is a c suite individual at a large company). How do they decide if itβs fair or not to decide an employee is not meeting expectations?
Anonymous wrote:For the next six months, you present all of her work as having been done by a male colleague and at the end of the six months you break it to him.
Also, you can help her find a better team.
You can also report it to his supervisor.
You can document everything he does, everything he says, and you can report it to HR.
These are multiple ways that you can deal with this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the next six months, you present all of her work as having been done by a male colleague and at the end of the six months you break it to him.
Also, you can help her find a better team.
You can also report it to his supervisor.
You can document everything he does, everything he says, and you can report it to HR.
These are multiple ways that you can deal with this.
op - this is absolutely brilliant
Anonymous wrote:For the next six months, you present all of her work as having been done by a male colleague and at the end of the six months you break it to him.
Also, you can help her find a better team.
You can also report it to his supervisor.
You can document everything he does, everything he says, and you can report it to HR.
These are multiple ways that you can deal with this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What reason did he give?
he just says things like 'she's not good'. He says that a lot about her and her deliverables.
It's funny we recently showed him a deliverable that we had compiled almost wholly using claude cowork from direction he'd given in emails, messages and meetings and he said it was 'really bad'.
I asked him to sit with her and try to show her how to improve and admitted that I wasn't able to understand what she was doing wrong myself and he said 'she's just the wrong person for this job and we need to manage her out'.
I don't even know what this means/how it is relevant. You used AI and the results were bad? Cool story. That has nothing to do with her or her work. You say she's an excellent performer, yet you want HIM to sit down with YOUR direct report to show her how to improve? Sounds like the problem is you, not her.
Surely you have KPIs, metrics, things you can track on her deliverables?
Anonymous wrote:For the next six months, you present all of her work as having been done by a male colleague and at the end of the six months you break it to him.
Also, you can help her find a better team.
You can also report it to his supervisor.
You can document everything he does, everything he says, and you can report it to HR.
These are multiple ways that you can deal with this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What reason did he give?
he just says things like 'she's not good'. He says that a lot about her and her deliverables.
It's funny we recently showed him a deliverable that we had compiled almost wholly using claude cowork from direction he'd given in emails, messages and meetings and he said it was 'really bad'.
I asked him to sit with her and try to show her how to improve and admitted that I wasn't able to understand what she was doing wrong myself and he said 'she's just the wrong person for this job and we need to manage her out'.
Anonymous wrote:What reason did he give?