Anonymous wrote:Why was this only $900K in 2014? That seems very inexpensive.
The county records say this is approximately 4900 sq ft above ground, and 1700 sq ft below ground. That's quite a difference with the 11,500 sq ft in the listing.
Anonymous wrote:Why was this only $900K in 2014? That seems very inexpensive.
The county records say this is approximately 4900 sq ft above ground, and 1700 sq ft below ground. That's quite a difference with the 11,500 sq ft in the listing.