Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not a big fan of accommodations.
So, my kid with 13th percentile processing speed shouldn't get more time on tests? Why, exactly?
Wait, are we really giving kids with "slow processing speed" extra time to equalize them with kids who do not have "slow processing speed"?
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not a big fan of accommodations.
So, my kid with 13th percentile processing speed shouldn't get more time on tests? Why, exactly?
For the same reason my kid with 13th percentile sprinting speed shouldn't get a 40-meter head start in the 100 meter dash.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not a big fan of accommodations.
So, my kid with 13th percentile processing speed shouldn't get more time on tests? Why, exactly?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This issue has been addressed as nauseum. Maybe not with respect to this particular editorial, but it has been greatly discussed. For those of us with kids with learning disabilities, it can be a very frustrating topic because learning disabilities are something you can’t see so people assume that you’re gaming the system when you’re not.
This is a lot like the service animal issue.
some people really need them but about 90% of the people claiming they need them do not actually need them.
This ruins it for everyone and now nobody really believes that anything other than a seeing eye dog is a service animal.
So when your 4.0 student with a 1400 on their SAT needs another hour on their SAT because they have some disability, it draws a lot of side-eye
Nobody gives a crap about a 3.0 student with a 950 SAT that needs more time because they can't sit still for 3 straight hours and needs an hour break in the middle of the exam.
Anonymous wrote:This issue has been addressed as nauseum. Maybe not with respect to this particular editorial, but it has been greatly discussed. For those of us with kids with learning disabilities, it can be a very frustrating topic because learning disabilities are something you can’t see so people assume that you’re gaming the system when you’re not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not a big fan of accommodations.
So, my kid with 13th percentile processing speed shouldn't get more time on tests? Why, exactly?
Anonymous wrote:I'm not a big fan of accommodations.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1304011.page
Anonymous wrote:This issue has been addressed as nauseum. Maybe not with respect to this particular editorial, but it has been greatly discussed. For those of us with kids with learning disabilities, it can be a very frustrating topic because learning disabilities are something you can’t see so people assume that you’re gaming the system when you’re not.
Anonymous wrote:This issue has been addressed as nauseum. Maybe not with respect to this particular editorial, but it has been greatly discussed.
For those of us with kids with learning disabilities, it can be a very frustrating topic because learning disabilities are something you can’t see so people assume that you’re gaming the system when you’re not.