Anonymous wrote:If new construction is going for $2, then the land is probably worth $700k. If your property is worth $1.1, then you would be losing $400k in equity when you raze your house. Your house still has value in addition to the land.
You would be better off selling your house for $1.1 and buying a tear down for $700k in the neighborhood. Then you would probably spend about $900k on construction and it will be worth the target $2 million.
So either way, you end up with a $2 million property, but the way you are trying to do it would cost you $2 million to get there, and the way you should do it, it would cost you $1.6 to get there.
Anonymous wrote:We looked seriously at this and ended up going the tear down route. Your numbers are actually in the range where it can make sense.
For lenders, you want a construction-to-permanent loan. A few that come up a lot around here are U.S. Bank, PNC Bank, and Wells Fargo. Also check local credit unions. The key is finding one that will give you full credit for your lot value as equity and offer a one-time close.
With a $700K lot, you are in a strong position. Many lenders will treat that as your down payment, which can significantly reduce how much cash you need to bring in.
On keeping the 2% mortgage, almost certainly no. The construction loan will pay off your existing loan, and lenders will not leave a low-rate mortgage in place on a property being torn down.
One thing to keep in mind is that the numbers tighten up fast. Demo, permits, rent during construction, and higher interest rates add up. It can still work, especially if you plan to stay long term, but it is not as wide a margin as it first looks.
Anonymous wrote:We looked seriously at this and ended up going the tear down route. Your numbers are actually in the range where it can make sense.
For lenders, you want a construction-to-permanent loan. A few that come up a lot around here are U.S. Bank, PNC Bank, and Wells Fargo. Also check local credit unions. The key is finding one that will give you full credit for your lot value as equity and offer a one-time close.
With a $700K lot, you are in a strong position. Many lenders will treat that as your down payment, which can significantly reduce how much cash you need to bring in.
On keeping the 2% mortgage, almost certainly no. The construction loan will pay off your existing loan, and lenders will not leave a low-rate mortgage in place on a property being torn down.
One thing to keep in mind is that the numbers tighten up fast. Demo, permits, rent during construction, and higher interest rates add up. It can still work, especially if you plan to stay long term, but it is not as wide a margin as it first looks.
Anonymous wrote:Have you looked into a modular bump out addition?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If new construction is going for $2, then the land is probably worth $700k. If your property is worth $1.1, then you would be losing $400k in equity when you raze your house. Your house still has value in addition to the land.
You would be better off selling your house for $1.1 and buying a tear down for $700k in the neighborhood. Then you would probably spend about $900k on construction and it will be worth the target $2 million.
So either way, you end up with a $2 million property, but the way you are trying to do it would cost you $2 million to get there, and the way you should do it, it would cost you $1.6 to get there.
If their house has value beyond its land and can sell for 1.1. mil vs 700 then their house is not a tear down in the first place. They just don't like it anymore and want an upgrade. The easiest amove would be to sell it and just buy another house already built or remodeled to their tastes. Also, if the house has value of 400K, then how is it possible that remodel would be as costly as new construction? Building another level or raising ceilings (a new roof) cannot possibly cost 1.6 mil.
Anonymous wrote:If new construction is going for $2, then the land is probably worth $700k. If your property is worth $1.1, then you would be losing $400k in equity when you raze your house. Your house still has value in addition to the land.
You would be better off selling your house for $1.1 and buying a tear down for $700k in the neighborhood. Then you would probably spend about $900k on construction and it will be worth the target $2 million.
So either way, you end up with a $2 million property, but the way you are trying to do it would cost you $2 million to get there, and the way you should do it, it would cost you $1.6 to get there.