Anonymous wrote:I can actually see why the tax might make sense but Mamdani was dumb going after Ken Griffin to appease "tax the rich" crown. He didn't bother to check Griffin's charitable activity in NYC. Over past few years Griffin donated:
- $400mm to Sloan Kettering cancer center
- $40mm to Museum of Natural History
- $12mm to NYC Hospital for Special Surgery
- $25mm to NYC success academy charter schools
Additional tax on Griffin's penthouse will be a drop in the ocean in comparison to these numbers. If Griffin decides to reduce his donations, NYC will be worse off.
Anonymous wrote:There are pied-a-terres in Maryland??
Anonymous wrote:Because people hate ultra rich parasite people
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not even sure how they can enforce this. There so many ways to avoid classifying the property as a second home.
I have not followed this closely, but I suspect anyone who does not pay NY city taxes (income taxes) but owns a property over $5 mil would be subject to this new tax.
There is a lot of gamesmanship that can be had. For example, if you place in LLC or Trust and rent the property to yourself, rent the property to your child, etc.. It would no longer be considered a second home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not even sure how they can enforce this. There so many ways to avoid classifying the property as a second home.
I have not followed this closely, but I suspect anyone who does not pay NY city taxes (income taxes) but owns a property over $5 mil would be subject to this new tax.
Anonymous wrote:I am not even sure how they can enforce this. There so many ways to avoid classifying the property as a second home.
Anonymous wrote:Why are people who don’t live in NY weighing in on this?