Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, this sounds like exactly the kind of disappointment a lot of homeowners are waking up to.
5 to 10% output loss per year is not normal for properly functioning solar panels. Most reputable systems degrade closer to about 0.3% to 0.8% annually, not massive yearly drops. If someone is seeing that kind of decline after only five years, something is wrong, whether it's inverter issues, failed panels, poor installation, wiring problems, shading changes, or misleading original projections.
And that is where many people feel scammed. The sales pitch is usually "huge savings, guaranteed returns, low maintenance," but when production underperforms, suddenly the homeowner is stuck chasing warranty claims, arguing over monitoring data, and finding out there is no real guarantee of savings at all.
We know someone dealing with the same thing. Big promises upfront, then later it becomes "well results vary" and if the system is not functioning properly or underperforming, you may get little or nothing back while still having paid the full install cost.
This industry has been way too full of aggressive sales tactics, unrealistic payback timelines, and companies disappearing or dodging accountability after the install. Some systems work well, but far too many homeowners were sold dreams instead of real numbers.
Disagree that this is common. I actually wonder if it happened at all. There may be some shady operators out there (I certainly wouldn’t buy a tesla solar roof) but it isn’t hard to find a solid one. There are lots of solar coops that manage group purchasing and get good deals with solid companies.
We do know there are lots of people out there trying to spread FUD about solar because it threatens their investment in fossil fuels etc.
Tesla is the best one
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, this sounds like exactly the kind of disappointment a lot of homeowners are waking up to.
5 to 10% output loss per year is not normal for properly functioning solar panels. Most reputable systems degrade closer to about 0.3% to 0.8% annually, not massive yearly drops. If someone is seeing that kind of decline after only five years, something is wrong, whether it's inverter issues, failed panels, poor installation, wiring problems, shading changes, or misleading original projections.
And that is where many people feel scammed. The sales pitch is usually "huge savings, guaranteed returns, low maintenance," but when production underperforms, suddenly the homeowner is stuck chasing warranty claims, arguing over monitoring data, and finding out there is no real guarantee of savings at all.
We know someone dealing with the same thing. Big promises upfront, then later it becomes "well results vary" and if the system is not functioning properly or underperforming, you may get little or nothing back while still having paid the full install cost.
This industry has been way too full of aggressive sales tactics, unrealistic payback timelines, and companies disappearing or dodging accountability after the install. Some systems work well, but far too many homeowners were sold dreams instead of real numbers.
Disagree that this is common. I actually wonder if it happened at all. There may be some shady operators out there (I certainly wouldn’t buy a tesla solar roof) but it isn’t hard to find a solid one. There are lots of solar coops that manage group purchasing and get good deals with solid companies.
We do know there are lots of people out there trying to spread FUD about solar because it threatens their investment in fossil fuels etc.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, this sounds like exactly the kind of disappointment a lot of homeowners are waking up to.
5 to 10% output loss per year is not normal for properly functioning solar panels. Most reputable systems degrade closer to about 0.3% to 0.8% annually, not massive yearly drops. If someone is seeing that kind of decline after only five years, something is wrong, whether it's inverter issues, failed panels, poor installation, wiring problems, shading changes, or misleading original projections.
And that is where many people feel scammed. The sales pitch is usually "huge savings, guaranteed returns, low maintenance," but when production underperforms, suddenly the homeowner is stuck chasing warranty claims, arguing over monitoring data, and finding out there is no real guarantee of savings at all.
We know someone dealing with the same thing. Big promises upfront, then later it becomes "well results vary" and if the system is not functioning properly or underperforming, you may get little or nothing back while still having paid the full install cost.
This industry has been way too full of aggressive sales tactics, unrealistic payback timelines, and companies disappearing or dodging accountability after the install. Some systems work well, but far too many homeowners were sold dreams instead of real numbers.
Anonymous wrote:You need to clean them. We live in SoCal and clean ours every year.
Clean them and see if your output improves.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How often are you cleaning them?
We’ve never cleaned them. I posted on the home forum asking for a recommendation for a cleaner and everyone said that you don’t need to clean them around here.
Anonymous wrote:How often are you cleaning them?