Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't Barnard facing major financial issues too?
I recently read they are being enveloped completely by Columbia.
No, Columbia has not yet absorbed Barnard's projected $250-ish million in debt.
https://www.columbiaspectator.com/news/2024/12/03/with-252-million-in-projected-debt-barnard-makes-cuts-to-faculty-and-staff-benefits/
Based on available reports from late 2024, Barnard College is facing a significant, projected $252 million in debt and recurring deficits. Barnard is addressing this through internal budget cuts and reduced contributions to faculty/staff benefits. Columbia University has not officially absorbed this debt; Barnard is managing its own financial recovery plan.
Key details:
The Debt: Barnard’s projected debt stems from fiscal pressures as of fiscal year 2025, with previous annual operating deficits exceeding $20 million in FY23 and FY24.
Response: Rather than a bailout from Columbia, Barnard President Laura Rosenbury initiated a "reimagining" of financial operations to improve performance.
Relationship: While they are affiliated, Barnard is legally and financially separate from Columbia University and is responsible for its own budget.
Operational Costs: Historically, the two institutions pay each other for imbalances in cross-registration, a separate issue from managing total budgetary debt.
(Source: The Columbia Chronicle)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't Barnard facing major financial issues too?
I recently read they are being enveloped completely by Columbia.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USC was very stingy with aid this year, I 100% think it was due to budget deficit.
USC took a bunch of wealthy mediocre kids this year. I know a handful who got in with GPAs under 3.0 but from extremely wealthy families.
Anonymous wrote:Isn't Barnard facing major financial issues too?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USC was very stingy with aid this year, I 100% think it was due to budget deficit.
USC took a bunch of wealthy mediocre kids this year. I know a handful who got in with GPAs under 3.0 but from extremely wealthy families.
Anonymous wrote:We're compiling a college list now with our junior. Some colleges we've come across and researched have significant budget deficits. We are trying to figure out which ones to worry about.
We know that a college budget deficit can be a significant red flag, particularly if the uni is a small, private, or regional college with a low endowment. And a structural, long-term deficit often leads to reduced academic quality, fewer student services, etc.
Here are the colleges with budget deficits that we are aware of (see below). Are we missing any others we should know about? Which ones to truly worry about (I'm assuming some big ones will figure it out with its endowment but not sure if that's smart thinking)?
Colleges with Budget Deficits (rough amounts reported from the past year):
USC: $200 million
UChicago: $160 million
Stanford $140 million
Penn State: $140 million
Harvard: $113 million
American U: $80 million
GW: $76 million
NYU: $71 million
Boston U: $30 million
Middlebury: $14 million
WashU (St. Louis): $7 million
Brandeis: $2 million
Pitzer: $1.3 million
Anonymous wrote:USC was very stingy with aid this year, I 100% think it was due to budget deficit.
Anonymous wrote:There are many places like Forbes that explore this. The thing is there could be more legislation regarding foreign funding. Some of these places with billion-dollar endowments accepted many millions from Qatar. I think over the years more will be revealed about the hidden agreements/contracts and some really corrupt undertakings. It's complicated. Good luck!