Anonymous wrote:$74K in RE commissions to sell my house...nuts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You realize that most people do not move out of consideration for "net proceeds" ... right? People aren't necessarily selling because they "can't afford to live there." People move because they got a job in San Francisco, or because their aging parents need help back in Iowa, or because they are getting married to someone who is in Vermont, or they are retiring and heading to that hellhole of a state that is FL. Or whatever.
So most people are moving, not really getting any equity from their house sale, and urgently moving to be with their aging parents? Big old nope. Most people should have more than $100,000 equity from a million dollar house sale. If most people don’t, I take that as a bad economic indicator, which is my only point in bringing it up.
Anonymous wrote:You realize that most people do not move out of consideration for "net proceeds" ... right? People aren't necessarily selling because they "can't afford to live there." People move because they got a job in San Francisco, or because their aging parents need help back in Iowa, or because they are getting married to someone who is in Vermont, or they are retiring and heading to that hellhole of a state that is FL. Or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the Zillow feature "estimated net proceeds" is not always accurate. It happens to be accurate for my house. If we sold right now (assuming we sold for what Zillow thinks it could sell for), we would have over $500,000 in estimated net proceeds. That's the house selling price, minus the amount still owed on the mortgage, the closing costs, and the "prep and repair" costs.
I am noticing a lot of houses in my area selling for $1 Million to maybe $2 Million dollars, with an estimated net proceeds of $100,000 or sometimes significantly less. To me, that is not very much money to walk away with/ put into a down payment on the next place. It suggests people selling because they can't afford to live there anymore, because it's almost all of the houses I've checked in our area (north of Baltimore).
Am I reading this wrong?
Are you looking at when the purchased the home? Obviously, if they bought it since like 2024, then it makes sense the net proceeds aren't going to be super high.
Anonymous wrote:Where is this feature? I don't see it.
Anonymous wrote:I just did my house. It's best on when you bought plus classic mortgage, no refinance...They have no way to tell individual scenarios.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the Zillow feature "estimated net proceeds" is not always accurate. It happens to be accurate for my house. If we sold right now (assuming we sold for what Zillow thinks it could sell for), we would have over $500,000 in estimated net proceeds. That's the house selling price, minus the amount still owed on the mortgage, the closing costs, and the "prep and repair" costs.
I am noticing a lot of houses in my area selling for $1 Million to maybe $2 Million dollars, with an estimated net proceeds of $100,000 or sometimes significantly less. To me, that is not very much money to walk away with/ put into a down payment on the next place. It suggests people selling because they can't afford to live there anymore, because it's almost all of the houses I've checked in our area (north of Baltimore).
Am I reading this wrong?