Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The R word has lost its sting. Calling people and accusing people of racism is ineffective and overused.
At the very least she should address why she called or accused the parents of racism.
She can’t. If she could, she wouldn’t have used the word in the first place.
It’s a tiresome accusation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like the behaviors you described, but I am more concerned about the BOE being incompetent and refusing to ask tough questions of the Superintendent. Ultimately I think this stems from their low stipends and lack of independent staff. I'll happily vote for alternative candidates that aren't hateful, especially if they support more physical books and learning with pencil and paper. But honestly I don't think much will change until the BOE has more resources to provide actual oversight of the Superintendent.
More money would not help. She works for Mcps.
I have never seen or heard that Montoya works for MCPS. Where are you getting this from?
Anonymous wrote:The R word has lost its sting. Calling people and accusing people of racism is ineffective and overused.
At the very least she should address why she called or accused the parents of racism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her rhetoric towards constituents is unhinged, unprofessional and divisive. She owes the community an apology and the promise that she will do better.
2:05:00- “You can tell them to shut up” speaking about constituents.
Then later she talks about the ugly words thrown towards her. Ha!
2:06:20 “ So I want to be clear to this community and to all of my colleagues that a vote against this model is a vote to perpetuate the racist access to these programs that has been going on for some time.”
No. This is such a lazy and harmful comment. I haven’t met a person in opposition to increased access to these programs. You could have pushed this out a year or two to ensure the execution doesn’t further harm students in lower social economic areas. Framing in this way is reckless!
2:29:23 “That’s the racism” in response to those audience members who applauded Julie Yang’s vote against.
Just gross and shortsighted.
Let’s vote this person out.
so you don't like someone shining a mirror on you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her rhetoric towards constituents is unhinged, unprofessional and divisive. She owes the community an apology and the promise that she will do better.
2:05:00- “You can tell them to shut up” speaking about constituents.
Then later she talks about the ugly words thrown towards her. Ha!
2:06:20 “ So I want to be clear to this community and to all of my colleagues that a vote against this model is a vote to perpetuate the racist access to these programs that has been going on for some time.”
No. This is such a lazy and harmful comment. I haven’t met a person in opposition to increased access to these programs. You could have pushed this out a year or two to ensure the execution doesn’t further harm students in lower social economic areas. Framing in this way is reckless!
2:29:23 “That’s the racism” in response to those audience members who applauded Julie Yang’s vote against.
Just gross and shortsighted.
Let’s vote this person out.
so you don't like someone shining a mirror on you?
Anonymous wrote:Her rhetoric towards constituents is unhinged, unprofessional and divisive. She owes the community an apology and the promise that she will do better.
2:05:00- “You can tell them to shut up” speaking about constituents.
Then later she talks about the ugly words thrown towards her. Ha!
2:06:20 “ So I want to be clear to this community and to all of my colleagues that a vote against this model is a vote to perpetuate the racist access to these programs that has been going on for some time.”
No. This is such a lazy and harmful comment. I haven’t met a person in opposition to increased access to these programs. You could have pushed this out a year or two to ensure the execution doesn’t further harm students in lower social economic areas. Framing in this way is reckless!
2:29:23 “That’s the racism” in response to those audience members who applauded Julie Yang’s vote against.
Just gross and shortsighted.
Let’s vote this person out.
Anonymous wrote:I don't like the behaviors you described, but I am more concerned about the BOE being incompetent and refusing to ask tough questions of the Superintendent. Ultimately I think this stems from their low stipends and lack of independent staff. I'll happily vote for alternative candidates that aren't hateful, especially if they support more physical books and learning with pencil and paper. But honestly I don't think much will change until the BOE has more resources to provide actual oversight of the Superintendent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like the behaviors you described, but I am more concerned about the BOE being incompetent and refusing to ask tough questions of the Superintendent. Ultimately I think this stems from their low stipends and lack of independent staff. I'll happily vote for alternative candidates that aren't hateful, especially if they support more physical books and learning with pencil and paper. But honestly I don't think much will change until the BOE has more resources to provide actual oversight of the Superintendent.
More money would not help. She works for Mcps.
Anonymous wrote:I don't like the behaviors you described, but I am more concerned about the BOE being incompetent and refusing to ask tough questions of the Superintendent. Ultimately I think this stems from their low stipends and lack of independent staff. I'll happily vote for alternative candidates that aren't hateful, especially if they support more physical books and learning with pencil and paper. But honestly I don't think much will change until the BOE has more resources to provide actual oversight of the Superintendent.