Anonymous wrote:Yes you are being unreasonable. You are paying for her availability. Let her be for 2 hours, good grief.
I was a Nanny for 7 years for a family and yes I got free time once the kids started school. I had worked 11 hour days though for 2 years before getting 2.5 hours off twice a week. I earned it. They knew I was always available during the core hours so still paid me FT.
I’m now a parent and we overpay a sitter once a week now to take DD to soccer. We only need 90 mins bur pay for 3 hours to make it worth her while. We need the reliability. Don’t be cheap on childcare.
Anonymous wrote:household managing tasks are paid at much higher rate than nanny's in this area
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes you are being unreasonable. You are paying for her availability. Let her be for 2 hours, good grief.
I was a Nanny for 7 years for a family and yes I got free time once the kids started school. I had worked 11 hour days though for 2 years before getting 2.5 hours off twice a week. I earned it. They knew I was always available during the core hours so still paid me FT.
I’m now a parent and we overpay a sitter once a week now to take DD to soccer. We only need 90 mins bur pay for 3 hours to make it worth her while. We need the reliability. Don’t be cheap on childcare.
No, she is paying her to work. One hour break is fine, not two.
Anonymous wrote:Yes you are being unreasonable. You are paying for her availability. Let her be for 2 hours, good grief.
I was a Nanny for 7 years for a family and yes I got free time once the kids started school. I had worked 11 hour days though for 2 years before getting 2.5 hours off twice a week. I earned it. They knew I was always available during the core hours so still paid me FT.
I’m now a parent and we overpay a sitter once a week now to take DD to soccer. We only need 90 mins bur pay for 3 hours to make it worth her while. We need the reliability. Don’t be cheap on childcare.