Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the PP who was a judge again.
I don't think you guys understand what the OP means by mentored.
These aren't projects where you think "huh, seems like an adult helped"
These are projects where the university or industry lab is listed on the presentation. Where the kid literally talks about working in Dr so and so's lab. Where they use tools and materials only available in university or industry. Where the university seal is on every graph. They aren't pretending they did it themselves - they are basically sharing the results of their lab-based internship. It's amazing work that some of these kids are doing (like I said - literally working on curing cancer!) but it's not something that can be done by a child working at home or at school, no matter how much "help" mom and dad provide.
They should definitely be different categories.
Right. And you think a kid is just given free access to Dr. so and so’s lab and is told to have fun with it and receives no assistance while in that lab? You’re delusional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the PP who was a judge again.
I don't think you guys understand what the OP means by mentored.
These aren't projects where you think "huh, seems like an adult helped"
These are projects where the university or industry lab is listed on the presentation. Where the kid literally talks about working in Dr so and so's lab. Where they use tools and materials only available in university or industry. Where the university seal is on every graph. They aren't pretending they did it themselves - they are basically sharing the results of their lab-based internship. It's amazing work that some of these kids are doing (like I said - literally working on curing cancer!) but it's not something that can be done by a child working at home or at school, no matter how much "help" mom and dad provide.
They should definitely be different categories.
Right. And you think a kid is just given free access to Dr. so and so’s lab and is told to have fun with it and receives no assistance while in that lab? You’re delusional.
Anonymous wrote:This is why we won’t even bother participating in the farce that is the science fair. It’s completely unfair.
Anonymous wrote:This is the PP who was a judge again.
I don't think you guys understand what the OP means by mentored.
These aren't projects where you think "huh, seems like an adult helped"
These are projects where the university or industry lab is listed on the presentation. Where the kid literally talks about working in Dr so and so's lab. Where they use tools and materials only available in university or industry. Where the university seal is on every graph. They aren't pretending they did it themselves - they are basically sharing the results of their lab-based internship. It's amazing work that some of these kids are doing (like I said - literally working on curing cancer!) but it's not something that can be done by a child working at home or at school, no matter how much "help" mom and dad provide.
They should definitely be different categories.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No sour grapes - walked around and found a good number of projects that looked very advanced and ones that looked like what you'd expect from a HS student. I later found out that the advanced ones were mentored or the kid was part of a research team.
The thought I'm having is - should we split the two? Individual vs Mentored. I get kids soak info faster than we do and those mentored can showcase how far they've come. But I also saw a few kids build XYZ that looked awesome but didn't get anywhere.
Judges supposedly take this into their scoring but I don't think they do.
I'm probably missing something - so let me ask the crowd.
How did you find this out about all[b] that moved on?
Anonymous wrote:No sour grapes - walked around and found a good number of projects that looked very advanced and ones that looked like what you'd expect from a HS student. I later found out that the advanced ones were mentored or the kid was part of a research team.
The thought I'm having is - should we split the two? Individual vs Mentored. I get kids soak info faster than we do and those mentored can showcase how far they've come. But I also saw a few kids build XYZ that looked awesome but didn't get anywhere.
Judges supposedly take this into their scoring but I don't think they do.
I'm probably missing something - so let me ask the crowd.