Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think so. Shoes that are supportive have a lot of heft - thicker sole, arch support, wider toe box — all the things that don’t make your feet look dainty and cute.
I’ve settled on weighing comfort over fashion. Lately I’ve been wearing Norda trail runners in black. They’re a Canadian brand.
But hear me out - they’re made out of dyneema which is a really thin material so the shoes look less clunky and they are amazingly supportive - I can go all day in them and hike in them. They’re not as sleek as Adidas samba etc but they look less running shoe/orthopaedic than a Brooks running shoe (which I wear for running). I’ll wear these Nords trail runners with the same pants and dresses I’d wear my Birkenstock Arizonas with.
I also pack a pair of Camper ballet flats (Myra). Can’t hike in these but can walk longer in these than a dress shoe and they look fine for a dressier occasion.
Dang, I was ready to be all in on the Nordas and then saw the price.
Yes they’re pricey because of the Dyneema fabric - that’s also used for camping eg tents and those also have exorbitant prices.
I really love the shoe though - have tried all of the usual brands that are cute but none of them work for all day and all the brands that are comfortable but they’re either too sporty/outdoorsy/ugly - Merrell, Keen. I tried some Birkenstock Mary Janes- comfortable but too Hansel and Gretel looking. But love the sandals.