Anonymous wrote:Interest based = all students get their name drawn out of a hat
Criteria based = students are "vetted" to see if they meet minimum criteria (like have they taken Alg 1 in 8th grade, do they have 1 yr foreign language). If yes, their name gets thrown in the hat.
Both are lottery processes. This was said in one of the obscure info zoom sessions earlier this spring, but never written in print.
Sad to see the stellar magnet programs become a shell of what they have been.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS has been lying since October.
The Program Deign Team (who MCPS "deigns" to share their designs to) was notified that the criteria programs will be lottery based.
The non-lottery version, announced after parent resistance in October, was a lie to get parents off MCPS's back
Equity and Opportunity in MCPS are cancelled.
Ironically, MCPS middle scholers are studying Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" this week.
I am on the design team. We were told that a lottery for criteria-based magnets was something they were considering, but had not decided yet
(If so, it would not be pure lottery--it would be a "once you meet the criteria for entrance, you get selected by lottery rather than all the candidates being ranked and picking the top ones" type lottery. Somewhat like CES or MS except I think the idea is that the bar would be higher and there would be enough spots for most kids who meet the criteria with only a small number left out, which is very much not the case in ES/MS.)
Peter Ostrander seems very involved in the work on this at this point, so if anyone knows how he feels about lottery versus ranked selection, that might give some hints how this is going to go (although I'm sure he's not the only one involved in making the decision.)
Is Mr O explicit about what the criteria would be like for the new criteria-based programs? Right now the bar is incredibly low, for W schools, at least 80% of the student body meets the bars. So lottery would be a joke and the program as it’s not targeted to the supposed student body.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS has been lying since October.
The Program Deign Team (who MCPS "deigns" to share their designs to) was notified that the criteria programs will be lottery based.
The non-lottery version, announced after parent resistance in October, was a lie to get parents off MCPS's back
Equity and Opportunity in MCPS are cancelled.
Ironically, MCPS middle scholers are studying Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" this week.
I am on the design team. We were told that a lottery for criteria-based magnets was something they were considering, but had not decided yet
(If so, it would not be pure lottery--it would be a "once you meet the criteria for entrance, you get selected by lottery rather than all the candidates being ranked and picking the top ones" type lottery. Somewhat like CES or MS except I think the idea is that the bar would be higher and there would be enough spots for most kids who meet the criteria with only a small number left out, which is very much not the case in ES/MS.)
Peter Ostrander seems very involved in the work on this at this point, so if anyone knows how he feels about lottery versus ranked selection, that might give some hints how this is going to go (although I'm sure he's not the only one involved in making the decision.)
Is Mr O explicit about what the criteria would be like for the new criteria-based programs? Right now the bar is incredibly low, for W schools, at least 80% of the student body meets the bars. So lottery would be a joke and the program as it’s not targeted to the supposed student body.
What are you referring to with "right now"?
Or the strict minimum criteria for even applying to SMCS and RMIB?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS has been lying since October.
The Program Deign Team (who MCPS "deigns" to share their designs to) was notified that the criteria programs will be lottery based.
The non-lottery version, announced after parent resistance in October, was a lie to get parents off MCPS's back
Equity and Opportunity in MCPS are cancelled.
Ironically, MCPS middle scholers are studying Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" this week.
I am on the design team. We were told that a lottery for criteria-based magnets was something they were considering, but had not decided yet
(If so, it would not be pure lottery--it would be a "once you meet the criteria for entrance, you get selected by lottery rather than all the candidates being ranked and picking the top ones" type lottery. Somewhat like CES or MS except I think the idea is that the bar would be higher and there would be enough spots for most kids who meet the criteria with only a small number left out, which is very much not the case in ES/MS.)
Peter Ostrander seems very involved in the work on this at this point, so if anyone knows how he feels about lottery versus ranked selection, that might give some hints how this is going to go (although I'm sure he's not the only one involved in making the decision.)
Is Mr O explicit about what the criteria would be like for the new criteria-based programs? Right now the bar is incredibly low, for W schools, at least 80% of the student body meets the bars. So lottery would be a joke and the program as it’s not targeted to the supposed student body.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS has been lying since October.
The Program Deign Team (who MCPS "deigns" to share their designs to) was notified that the criteria programs will be lottery based.
The non-lottery version, announced after parent resistance in October, was a lie to get parents off MCPS's back
Equity and Opportunity in MCPS are cancelled.
Ironically, MCPS middle scholers are studying Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" this week.
I am on the design team. We were told that a lottery for criteria-based magnets was something they were considering, but had not decided yet
(If so, it would not be pure lottery--it would be a "once you meet the criteria for entrance, you get selected by lottery rather than all the candidates being ranked and picking the top ones" type lottery. Somewhat like CES or MS except I think the idea is that the bar would be higher and there would be enough spots for most kids who meet the criteria with only a small number left out, which is very much not the case in ES/MS.)
Peter Ostrander seems very involved in the work on this at this point, so if anyone knows how he feels about lottery versus ranked selection, that might give some hints how this is going to go (although I'm sure he's not the only one involved in making the decision.)
Anonymous wrote:MCPS has been lying since October.
The Program Deign Team (who MCPS "deigns" to share their designs to) was notified that the criteria programs will be lottery based.
The non-lottery version, announced after parent resistance in October, was a lie to get parents off MCPS's back
Equity and Opportunity in MCPS are cancelled.
Ironically, MCPS middle scholers are studying Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" this week.
Anonymous wrote:This isn’t surprising- that’s how the DCC worked.
Anonymous wrote:Interest based = all students get their name drawn out of a hat
Criteria based = students are "vetted" to see if they meet minimum criteria (like have they taken Alg 1 in 8th grade, do they have 1 yr foreign language). If yes, their name gets thrown in the hat.
Both are lottery processes. This was said in one of the obscure info zoom sessions earlier this spring, but never written in print.
Sad to see the stellar magnet programs become a shell of what they have been.