Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ideally, I prefer Crockett. However, she has a great position right now in the House and uses her platform well. I’d love for her to continue and grow in that roll.
Based on a few things, Talarico may be the better candidate for Texas and I think voters who want a fresh face and more youth in the Senate will like that too.
This way, we get both.
Can Crockett keep her House seat if she loses the Senate primary? I’m not sure.
I prefer Talarico in this race because Crockett hasn’t really presented a good reason for her running other than “Trump hates me” and she’s polling worse than he is against all of the possible opponents.
Crockett will be out of the House, the House primary is same day as Senate and she can only run for one
Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ideally, I prefer Crockett. However, she has a great position right now in the House and uses her platform well. I’d love for her to continue and grow in that roll.
Based on a few things, Talarico may be the better candidate for Texas and I think voters who want a fresh face and more youth in the Senate will like that too.
This way, we get both.
Can Crockett keep her House seat if she loses the Senate primary? I’m not sure.
I prefer Talarico in this race because Crockett hasn’t really presented a good reason for her running other than “Trump hates me” and she’s polling worse than he is against all of the possible opponents.
Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ideally, I prefer Crockett. However, she has a great position right now in the House and uses her platform well. I’d love for her to continue and grow in that roll.
Based on a few things, Talarico may be the better candidate for Texas and I think voters who want a fresh face and more youth in the Senate will like that too.
This way, we get both.
Can Crockett keep her House seat if she loses the Senate primary? I’m not sure.
I prefer Talarico in this race because Crockett hasn’t really presented a good reason for her running other than “Trump hates me” and she’s polling worse than he is against all of the possible opponents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech
Crockett has no chance in Texas, against either Paxson or Cornyn. I think you know why.
Talarico has a small chance, but in the end, I don't think he'll win a statewide election.
Texas isn't going blue any time soon.
Anonymous wrote:Ideally, I prefer Crockett. However, she has a great position right now in the House and uses her platform well. I’d love for her to continue and grow in that roll.
Based on a few things, Talarico may be the better candidate for Texas and I think voters who want a fresh face and more youth in the Senate will like that too.
This way, we get both.
role not roll - ugh, I thought I edited better.Anonymous wrote:Ideally, I prefer Crockett. However, she has a great position right now in the House and uses her platform well. I’d love for her to continue and grow in that roll.
Based on a few things, Talarico may be the better candidate for Texas and I think voters who want a fresh face and more youth in the Senate will like that too.
This way, we get both.
Anonymous wrote:Who do you feel would be a better senator?
I feel Talarico has the demographic advantage but Crockett is a strong proponent of plain speech