Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get the disdain for D2s?
The D2 schools in our area are roughly $25k a year (including tuition, room/board, etc.).
The closest D1 is ~$65k.
The largest and successful D3 nearby is ~$55k. The smaller less successful D3 programs are all over $70k. There are a few, public adjacent D3s in the area that are in the $30-40k range.
For a player that is able to play at any of those level, why exclude schools that are $30k per year cheaper? Is having a "big name" on the diploma really worth $120k or more extra over 4 years?
Yes, I know the sticker price isn't the final price. I'm just using the sticker price for ease of comparison.
There's no disdain for D2. They aren't around the DMV area. also, to the person that said in 2028, college soccer will be year round, that's probably only the p4 of mens soccer. I doubt they will roll it out for womens any time soon.
Anonymous wrote:I don't get the disdain for D2s?
The D2 schools in our area are roughly $25k a year (including tuition, room/board, etc.).
The closest D1 is ~$65k.
The largest and successful D3 nearby is ~$55k. The smaller less successful D3 programs are all over $70k. There are a few, public adjacent D3s in the area that are in the $30-40k range.
For a player that is able to play at any of those level, why exclude schools that are $30k per year cheaper? Is having a "big name" on the diploma really worth $120k or more extra over 4 years?
Yes, I know the sticker price isn't the final price. I'm just using the sticker price for ease of comparison.
Anonymous wrote:Would you rather have your child play D1 at ODU or D3 at Amherst
Anonymous wrote:Would you rather have your child play D1 at ODU or D3 at Amherst
Anonymous wrote:Would you rather have your child play D1 at ODU or D3 at Amherst
Anonymous wrote:So many kids (and parents) are head over heels on getting that D1 ticket. But even if they get in a D1, they are only getting bench time, threatened to be cut, twice a week games and travel, and 3 months of game season in a year. Even if they survived that horrible situation and “played” 4 years, they have maybe 1% of chance turning pro.
Instead, if they put academic first and choose the best learning environment over the division number, they could have a balanced college experience and end up in a much better place with many more choices 4 years later.
I don’t get it if the parents can afford college but let the kid choose a never heard of D1 or D2 over a prestigious D3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So many kids (and parents) are head over heels on getting that D1 ticket. But even if they get in a D1, they are only getting bench time, threatened to be cut, twice a week games and travel, and 3 months of game season in a year. Even if they survived that horrible situation and “played” 4 years, they have maybe 1% of chance turning pro.
Instead, if they put academic first and choose the best learning environment over the division number, they could have a balanced college experience and end up in a much better place with many more choices 4 years later.
I don’t get it if the parents can afford college but let the kid choose a never heard of D1 or D2 over a prestigious D3.
So the kids at a D1 not playing soccer has less chances and opportunities for personal success in life than a kid not playing soccer at a D3?
We are comparing lower academic D1 with good academic D3. I’d always choose the latter, but I felt like an outlier in this area. I don’t think scholarship is the reason here, as families can’t afford college won’t be able to afford years of club soccer of all brands.
Anonymous wrote:So many kids (and parents) are head over heels on getting that D1 ticket. But even if they get in a D1, they are only getting bench time, threatened to be cut, twice a week games and travel, and 3 months of game season in a year. Even if they survived that horrible situation and “played” 4 years, they have maybe 1% of chance turning pro.
Instead, if they put academic first and choose the best learning environment over the division number, they could have a balanced college experience and end up in a much better place with many more choices 4 years later.
I don’t get it if the parents can afford college but let the kid choose a never heard of D1 or D2 over a prestigious D3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So many kids (and parents) are head over heels on getting that D1 ticket. But even if they get in a D1, they are only getting bench time, threatened to be cut, twice a week games and travel, and 3 months of game season in a year. Even if they survived that horrible situation and “played” 4 years, they have maybe 1% of chance turning pro.
Instead, if they put academic first and choose the best learning environment over the division number, they could have a balanced college experience and end up in a much better place with many more choices 4 years later.
I don’t get it if the parents can afford college but let the kid choose a never heard of D1 or D2 over a prestigious D3.
So the kids at a D1 not playing soccer has less chances and opportunities for personal success in life than a kid not playing soccer at a D3?
Anonymous wrote:So many kids (and parents) are head over heels on getting that D1 ticket. But even if they get in a D1, they are only getting bench time, threatened to be cut, twice a week games and travel, and 3 months of game season in a year. Even if they survived that horrible situation and “played” 4 years, they have maybe 1% of chance turning pro.
Instead, if they put academic first and choose the best learning environment over the division number, they could have a balanced college experience and end up in a much better place with many more choices 4 years later.
I don’t get it if the parents can afford college but let the kid choose a never heard of D1 or D2 over a prestigious D3.