Anonymous wrote:OP: what is your SAT score? Over and over again they found a high correlation between the SAT score and the academic performance in colleges, especially in T10 colleges. I think if you score above their 75% line, it’s unlikely you will be in the bottom half.
Anonymous wrote:At places like top 10, half the class is going to be below the median, 25% of the class will be below top 75 percentile. That’s just how it works.
I get it that you’re still surrounded by smart people, big-name professors, and strong recruiting pipelines. But does that actually translate into good outcomes for students in the bottom half or bottom quartiel? Are they still landing solid jobs and grad school placements?
On the flip side, what
if you went to a slightly less selective school and ended up in the top 10–20%? You might get more leadership roles, closer relationships with professors, stronger recommendation letters, and maybe just more confidence overall. Does standing out more beat having a big brand name on your resume?
How people think about this tradeoff. Is prestige worth it even if you’re below average there? Or is it smarter to pick the place where you’re more likely to shine?
Would love to hear from people who’ve actually seen this play out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At places like top 10, half the class is going to be below the median, 25% of the class will be below top 75 percentile. That’s just how it works.
I get it that you’re still surrounded by smart people, big-name professors, and strong recruiting pipelines. But does that actually translate into good outcomes for students in the bottom half or bottom quartiel? Are they still landing solid jobs and grad school placements?
On the flip side, what if you went to a slightly less selective school and ended up in the top 10–20%? You might get more leadership roles, closer relationships with professors, stronger recommendation letters, and maybe just more confidence overall. Does standing out more beat having a big brand name on your resume?
How people think about this tradeoff. Is prestige worth it even if you’re below average there? Or is it smarter to pick the place where you’re more likely to shine?
Would love to hear from people who’ve actually seen this play out.
A bottom half Harvard student would not be top 10-20% at JHU, Rice, Michigan, etc
Anonymous wrote:I’m pretty sure I graduated in the bottom half of my T10 - no actual class rank, but I missed the cum laude cutoff.
I then crushed the LSAT, went to a T14 law school and then on to BigLaw in NYC.
No regrets. I may have graduated in the bottom half, but my college actually WAS the perfect fit for me. Yes, my GPA took a hit the first two years - mostly because I was having a ton of fun and came in without the necessary time management and study skills to truly balance work and play.
But I never once wished I had gone to a less rigorous or intense school. I knew I belonged where I ended up. I was every bit as bright as my classmates and just as curious and interested in the rigorous curriculum. I just didn’t go the extra mile the first two years like many of my classmates did automatically. (Didn’t go to office hours, barely revised my papers, and didn’t always study properly for tests.)
So I finished with a lower GPA, but I got an incredible education, including learning how to kick it into a higher gear when needed. It all served me very well in law school (high grades) and as a lawyer, too.
Anonymous wrote:I’m pretty sure I graduated in the bottom half of my T10 - no actual class rank, but I missed the cum laude cutoff.
I then crushed the LSAT, went to a T14 law school and then on to BigLaw in NYC.
No regrets. I may have graduated in the bottom half, but my college actually WAS the perfect fit for me. Yes, my GPA took a hit the first two years - mostly because I was having a ton of fun and came in without the necessary time management and study skills to truly balance work and play.
But I never once wished I had gone to a less rigorous or intense school. I knew I belonged where I ended up. I was every bit as bright as my classmates and just as curious and interested in the rigorous curriculum. I just didn’t go the extra mile the first two years like many of my classmates did automatically. (Didn’t go to office hours, barely revised my papers, and didn’t always study properly for tests.)
So I finished with a lower GPA, but I got an incredible education, including learning how to kick it into a higher gear when needed. It all served me very well in law school (high grades) and as a lawyer, too.
Anonymous wrote:At places like top 10, half the class is going to be below the median, 25% of the class will be below top 75 percentile. That’s just how it works.
I get it that you’re still surrounded by smart people, big-name professors, and strong recruiting pipelines. But does that actually translate into good outcomes for students in the bottom half or bottom quartiel? Are they still landing solid jobs and grad school placements?
On the flip side, what if you went to a slightly less selective school and ended up in the top 10–20%? You might get more leadership roles, closer relationships with professors, stronger recommendation letters, and maybe just more confidence overall. Does standing out more beat having a big brand name on your resume?
How people think about this tradeoff. Is prestige worth it even if you’re below average there? Or is it smarter to pick the place where you’re more likely to shine?
Would love to hear from people who’ve actually seen this play out.
Anonymous wrote:At places like top 10, half the class is going to be below the median, 25% of the class will be below top 75 percentile. That’s just how it works.
I get it that you’re still surrounded by smart people, big-name professors, and strong recruiting pipelines. But does that actually translate into good outcomes for students in the bottom half or bottom quartiel? Are they still landing solid jobs and grad school placements?
On the flip side, what if you went to a slightly less selective school and ended up in the top 10–20%? You might get more leadership roles, closer relationships with professors, stronger recommendation letters, and maybe just more confidence overall. Does standing out more beat having a big brand name on your resume?
How people think about this tradeoff. Is prestige worth it even if you’re below average there? Or is it smarter to pick the place where you’re more likely to shine?
Would love to hear from people who’ve actually seen this play out.