Anonymous wrote:there is about 3.5 million graduating seniors .. of which 60% go to 4yr universities which is about 2.1 million kids. top 99th percentile in test scores ... say 1530 ish SAT, that would make it 21k kids. top 98th percentile (2% of kids) equals 42k students ... plenty to fill T25
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Huh? Why would they care about score declines?
All colleges care about the average scores or mid 50% range they report to the public It affects their prestige and ranking. The ones like Princeton that has been TO and also accepting a lot more LIFG than before and continue to accept athletes will be most affected. Once they have to disclose scores for every admitted student, their average will drop like rocks.
Highly selective colleges get high scoring applicants all the time, in fact they reject a large number of 1600 every year. There is no deficit of high scorers at places like Penn, Hopkins, or MIT. A high score without more isn't moving the needle. I just don't understand how your logic works. It's very one dimensional.
there actually isnt that many 1550+ with all 5s and leadership EC and published research--its much more rare than you think, my kid got into all ea which we were baffled by, for engineering, maybe being wf was hook but i think it was the high test numbers and then many social leadership ecs--kids in her school had either the numbers or the social part--none with both--now we will see if she gets in to private or ivy-she lacks awards and an art hook-which the art hook is a big minus for ivy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Huh? Why would they care about score declines?
All colleges care about the average scores or mid 50% range they report to the public It affects their prestige and ranking. The ones like Princeton that has been TO and also accepting a lot more LIFG than before and continue to accept athletes will be most affected. Once they have to disclose scores for every admitted student, their average will drop like rocks.
Highly selective colleges get high scoring applicants all the time, in fact they reject a large number of 1600 every year. There is no deficit of high scorers at places like Penn, Hopkins, or MIT. A high score without more isn't moving the needle. I just don't understand how your logic works. It's very one dimensional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Huh? Why would they care about score declines?
All colleges care about the average scores or mid 50% range they report to the public It affects their prestige and ranking. The ones like Princeton that has been TO and also accepting a lot more LIFG than before and continue to accept athletes will be most affected. Once they have to disclose scores for every admitted student, their average will drop like rocks.
Anonymous wrote:Huh? Why would they care about score declines?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who has been most affected by budget/funding cuts?
Which colleges are most at risk of dramatic score decline after ending test optional?
The only ones that are marginally affected by what you described are the ones receiving huge amount of federal funding and are test required.
The only one fits the bill appears to be Johns Hopkins.
Anonymous wrote:Who has been most affected by budget/funding cuts?
Which colleges are most at risk of dramatic score decline after ending test optional?