Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think carriers need to do more due diligence that the fetus they're carrying and intending to give will go to good people. And in general, this industry needs regulation. There needs to be a cap on how many children you can have through surrogacy.
I think it is unrealistic to put the burden of due diligence on the surrogates. They are usually doing it because they are desperate for money and the surrogacy agencies cover for the intended parents in shady situations because they are the source of all the money.
I personally support banning commercial surrogacy, but, at the very least, the industry clearly needs better regulation. The surrogacy agencies involved in the case of the Chinese couple with 25 kids must have known something wasn't right but they didn't care as long as they got paid.
Anonymous wrote:I think carriers need to do more due diligence that the fetus they're carrying and intending to give will go to good people. And in general, this industry needs regulation. There needs to be a cap on how many children you can have through surrogacy.
Anonymous wrote:I think carriers need to do more due diligence that the fetus they're carrying and intending to give will go to good people. And in general, this industry needs regulation. There needs to be a cap on how many children you can have through surrogacy.
Anonymous wrote:Is this the Chinese couple? I'm pretty sure there's at least one other thread about this "family".
Anonymous wrote:Is it just me or are a lot of these bonkers surrogacy stories involving Chinese nationals? What’s up with that?
Anonymous wrote:I think carriers need to do more due diligence that the fetus they're carrying and intending to give will go to good people. And in general, this industry needs regulation. There needs to be a cap on how many children you can have through surrogacy.
Anonymous wrote:Paywall