Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a great way to inflate the ego of students who already have inflated egos because they attend Harvard.
How many Harvard kids do you actually know?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a great way to inflate the ego of students who already have inflated egos because they attend Harvard.
How many Harvard kids do you actually know?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's just dumb. If you take the tippy top, grinding students and put them all together, it's not unreasonable to think that these kids can continue to achieve at the highest levels. And yes, it will make them nuttier than they already are. The professors shouldn't give out A's just because, but if the papers and tests meet their standard, it's not weird that more than half the class of the kinds of students who get admitted can meet them.
No. I’ve taught at one of HYP, and there’s a huge variation in student performance!
Top 20% at UMass blows away the bottom 20% at Harvard…
Anonymous wrote:What a great way to inflate the ego of students who already have inflated egos because they attend Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's just dumb. If you take the tippy top, grinding students and put them all together, it's not unreasonable to think that these kids can continue to achieve at the highest levels. And yes, it will make them nuttier than they already are. The professors shouldn't give out A's just because, but if the papers and tests meet their standard, it's not weird that more than half the class of the kinds of students who get admitted can meet them.
No. I’ve taught at one of HYP, and there’s a huge variation in student performance!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's just dumb. If you take the tippy top, grinding students and put them all together, it's not unreasonable to think that these kids can continue to achieve at the highest levels. And yes, it will make them nuttier than they already are. The professors shouldn't give out A's just because, but if the papers and tests meet their standard, it's not weird that more than half the class of the kinds of students who get admitted can meet them.
I'm sorry.... "tippy top?" Would you please use adult words? Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's just dumb. If you take the tippy top, grinding students and put them all together, it's not unreasonable to think that these kids can continue to achieve at the highest levels. And yes, it will make them nuttier than they already are. The professors shouldn't give out A's just because, but if the papers and tests meet their standard, it's not weird that more than half the class of the kinds of students who get admitted can meet them.
No. I’ve taught at one of HYP, and there’s a huge variation in student performance!
Anonymous wrote:That's just dumb. If you take the tippy top, grinding students and put them all together, it's not unreasonable to think that these kids can continue to achieve at the highest levels. And yes, it will make them nuttier than they already are. The professors shouldn't give out A's just because, but if the papers and tests meet their standard, it's not weird that more than half the class of the kinds of students who get admitted can meet them.
Anonymous wrote:That's just dumb. If you take the tippy top, grinding students and put them all together, it's not unreasonable to think that these kids can continue to achieve at the highest levels. And yes, it will make them nuttier than they already are. The professors shouldn't give out A's just because, but if the papers and tests meet their standard, it's not weird that more than half the class of the kinds of students who get admitted can meet them.