Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For an undergraduate-focused experience that might be similar to, say, that of a NESCAC such as Williams or Hamilton, look into Mount Allison and Acadia.
Completely disagree. Mount A is an 89% acceptance rate. Not an academic match to Williams or Hamilton. Stay away from the Maritime university in Canada. sub-par.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For an undergraduate-focused experience that might be similar to, say, that of a NESCAC such as Williams or Hamilton, look into Mount Allison and Acadia.
Completely disagree. Mount A is an 89% acceptance rate. Not an academic match to Williams or Hamilton. Stay away from the Maritime university in Canada. sub-par.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kind of student that does well at U of T or McGill is the kind of student that does well at Michigan or UCLA. They'll need to be self-starters, have some initiative, be able to make the most of things, and so on. There isn't a lot of hand holding, but all the opportunities are there for students that are grounded and motivated.
I disagree with this statement unless you are talking purely academically…but many kids switch colleges for non-academic reasons.
I think the successful kids at Canadian colleges go into the entire experience with eyes wide open. They understand there will be no real team sports to watch…that like 40% of all students still live at home and commute…that college life will be very different vs attending Michigan and UCLA, etc.
My son’s best friend has a Canadian parent and attends McGill (for very little $$$s…which is why he is there). He likes Montreal and found some friends, but he wishes he could have attended UVA or any number of state flagships for all the non-academic things that US schools offer. It is what it is and he doesn’t dwell on it…the $30k+ per year savings was too much to ignore.
There are team sports.
My daughter will be attending Bishops University in Sherbrooke in the fall. The admission counselor has been great with helping her through the application process. She’s already chatted with current students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kind of student that does well at U of T or McGill is the kind of student that does well at Michigan or UCLA. They'll need to be self-starters, have some initiative, be able to make the most of things, and so on. There isn't a lot of hand holding, but all the opportunities are there for students that are grounded and motivated.
I disagree with this statement unless you are talking purely academically…but many kids switch colleges for non-academic reasons.
I think the successful kids at Canadian colleges go into the entire experience with eyes wide open. They understand there will be no real team sports to watch…that like 40% of all students still live at home and commute…that college life will be very different vs attending Michigan and UCLA, etc.
My son’s best friend has a Canadian parent and attends McGill (for very little $$$s…which is why he is there). He likes Montreal and found some friends, but he wishes he could have attended UVA or any number of state flagships for all the non-academic things that US schools offer. It is what it is and he doesn’t dwell on it…the $30k+ per year savings was too much to ignore.
Anonymous wrote:For an undergraduate-focused experience that might be similar to, say, that of a NESCAC such as Williams or Hamilton, look into Mount Allison and Acadia.
Anonymous wrote:Lots of activities, clubs, and opportunities to socialize in Canada. No need for a fraternity or sorority, esp at universities with a residential college system.
Anonymous wrote:The kind of student that does well at U of T or McGill is the kind of student that does well at Michigan or UCLA. They'll need to be self-starters, have some initiative, be able to make the most of things, and so on. There isn't a lot of hand holding, but all the opportunities are there for students that are grounded and motivated.