Anonymous wrote:
I support anyone who tries to uphold the authority of Congress. The Clintons should just get on with it. I am full of admiration for Hillary who spent 12 hours or so getting grilled by Congress for Benghazi. I know they're much older now and it's very tiring and stressful for them... but they should go and tell their truth. Let the world see they're old and frail with poor recall. Televise the bullying and victimization. Let the people hate Comer instead.

Congress is occupied by a majority of traitors who won't uphold the authority of Congress.

Anonymous wrote:They ALREADY DID testify in writing and they agreed to private interview with Comey. There are hundreds of people with more relevant testimony to offer than the Clinton's.

Meanwhile Comer isn't even trying to get the CURRENT leader of the DOJ to testify for her ACTIVE, ONGOING violation of the law Comgres passed in 2025.

The "oversight" committee has zero credibility, and cars only for grandstand in

Comer not Comey!

Anonymous wrote:I thought everyone wanted to get to the bottom of the Epstein files? The Clintons know more about his activities than anyone. Question is: Why WOULDN'T you want them to testify? I guess certain folks are above the law...

The Clintons know more than anyone?

Not Trump, who owned and lived in one of Epstein's bases of operations?

They ALREADY DID testify in writing and they agreed to private interview with Comey. There are hundreds of people with more relevant testimony to offer than the Clinton's.

Meanwhile Comey isn't even trying to get the CURRENT leader of the DOJ to testify for her ACTIVE, ONGOING violation of the law Comgres passed in 2025.

The "oversight" committee has zero credibility, and cars only for grandstand in

Anonymous wrote:
I support anyone who tries to uphold the authority of Congress. The Clintons should just get on with it. I am full of admiration for Hillary who spent 12 hours or so getting grilled by Congress for Benghazi. I know they're much older now and it's very tiring and stressful for them... but they should go and tell their truth. Let the world see they're old and frail with poor recall. Televise the bullying and victimization. Let the people hate Comer instead.

This. I don't see the justification not to testify.

I thought everyone wanted to get to the bottom of the Epstein files? The Clintons know more about his activities than anyone. Question is: Why WOULDN'T you want them to testify? I guess certain folks are above the law...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I’m less concerned of this vote than I am of Democrats voting to keep funding ICE, especially that POS Jared Golden, who’s telling his constituents he’s fine with them being under siege. The MF isn’t even running for reelection.

It's ALL concerning. We have no representation. There is no one in power genuinely on our side. They are on the side of money and power. Every single one of them. Open your eyes.

Dude, my eyes are open. I’m extremely active-like lobbying Congress IRL, countless hours mentoring down ballot candidates (Run for Something) to build a stronger bench, and run weekly protest. I choose not to be outraged over everything or I will get burned out.

I support anyone who tries to uphold the authority of Congress. The Clintons should just get on with it. I am full of admiration for Hillary who spent 12 hours or so getting grilled by Congress for Benghazi. I know they're much older now and it's very tiring and stressful for them... but they should go and tell their truth. Let the world see they're old and frail with poor recall. Televise the bullying and victimization. Let the people hate Comer instead.

I really don't care except thumis a distraction from the fact that Trump's DOJ is not compliant with releasing all of the files. MAGA don't care.

Anonymous wrote:I think they are trying to say that any congressional subpoena should be honored, to set the tone for next year.

This has advanced well beyond political posturing, and they (and you?) still don't seem to get that. It does not matter one wit what they do now. The GOP will not suddenly not be full of traitorous hypocrites, and they will not honor congressional subpoenas because a few democrats made a symbolic vote a year ago.

This is an actual witch hunt and the Clintons are right to ignore it. They are shameless politicians and Bill Clinton is a known womanizer. But there is no evidence whatsoever that he was involved with Epsteins illegal crimes. Whereas there is tons of evidence that Trump was.

I think they are trying to say that any congressional subpoena should be honored, to set the tone for next year.

Anonymous wrote: I’m less concerned of this vote than I am of Democrats voting to keep funding ICE, especially that POS Jared Golden, who’s telling his constituents he’s fine with them being under siege. The MF isn’t even running for reelection.

It's ALL concerning. We have no representation. There is no one in power genuinely on our side. They are on the side of money and power. Every single one of them. Open your eyes.

I’m less concerned of this vote than I am of Democrats voting to keep funding ICE, especially that POS Jared Golden, who’s telling his constituents he’s fine with them being under siege. The MF isn’t even running for reelection.

Haven't the Clintons already provided written testimony?

9 Democrat Reps cast meaningless votes in support of GOP witch hunt against Clintons on Epstein.

The vote was going to pass without them, but they had to make a performative show of aligning with the GOP traitors actively covering up Trump's culpability and supporting DOJ's contempt.


https://www.axios.com/2026/01/22/bill-clinton-contempt-epstein-democrats-jeffries