Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you need the money as a family? If you are behind on loans, retirement, etc, then maybe he should look for something with a MUCH higher salary. If not, maybe focus on finding other things in life -- if you have kids, coaching the team, or picking up a hobby. Keep the stability and build on life outside of the office.
How can you consider federal employment stable after this past year??
Anonymous wrote:Do you need the money as a family? If you are behind on loans, retirement, etc, then maybe he should look for something with a MUCH higher salary. If not, maybe focus on finding other things in life -- if you have kids, coaching the team, or picking up a hobby. Keep the stability and build on life outside of the office.
Anonymous wrote:I quit my federal job during the start of this current administration because I was fed up with DOGE, etc. I am a lawyer and had maxed out my pay at GS 15 for five years. I so very much miss the easy life of a federal employee. While I worked hard, it was so little compared to private sector. That said I was really not working in my full potential and the salary cap was starting to take a toll. Now I'm making 30% more than my federal salary not including bonus and working about 15 hrs more a week. My efficiency will improve as I get more up to speed and my salary will continue to increase more than inflation. Federal employees just don't get paid enough in certain fields. And while the work is interesting its usually to sub specialized to be marketable broadly. If he wants to just be comfortable at his current salary till retirement he should keep the job. If he wants to make more money and be more marketable he should get out when he is able.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here-large, corporate, financial- very stable. He is an economist.
Still very context-dependent. Litigation generates significant money for economists, but only in certain fields. A macro or finance person may draw interest from financial firms. Someone like a USDA economist will have a somewhat tougher time drawing interest from firms that would directly value the government work he has done. Economists with strong empirical skills are valued by a slew of companies, e.g., Amazon, Google, or government contractors. But the market for economists is weak right now, as both university and government hiring are way down, so at least at the moment he'll end up competing with a bunch of very strong new PhDs that would get academic or government jobs in a more normal year.
He should maybe start with any firms he interacted with in the course of his government service?
Anonymous wrote:OP here-large, corporate, financial- very stable. He is an economist.
Anonymous wrote:OP here-large, corporate, financial- very stable. He is an economist.
Anonymous wrote:OP here-large, corporate, financial- very stable. He is an economist.