Anonymous wrote:It’s a single data point. It’s possible that a few things happening. I feel like my students work super hard on the fall tests, but on the winter tests they’ve gotten comfortable and slack off a bit. They’re also just sick of tests, understandably.
The MAP expected growth midyear is like 3 or 4 points. The standard error of measurement is plus or minus 3 to 3.5 points. So a lot of kids look like no or minimal growth who are just fine. Look at unit test performance, etc.
A couple of my students who have shown AMAZING growth in class came in at almost identical MAP scores compared to fall. I’m not worried.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MAP testing isn’t everything. Don’t overthink the results.
My concern is the AAP selection. Is this winter score going to be included in the packet?
Whether it is or isn’t, there’s nothing you can do about it, so no sense in worrying.
Was the fall score extremely high to begin with? If he made a few lucky guesses to get there, maybe he didn’t make the same correct guesses this time. The test is designed to push to the end of their ability level, supposedly.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing for my 8th grader in Geometry. He has nt reported taking the MAP again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MAP testing isn’t everything. Don’t overthink the results.
My concern is the AAP selection. Is this winter score going to be included in the packet?
Anonymous wrote:MAP testing isn’t everything. Don’t overthink the results.