Anonymous wrote:Would you move to a job with significantly less responsibility that looks like a career step back if it paid double?
I currently work at a large tech company at the director level. I lead a team of managers and individual contributors with about 25 people in my overall organization, including two direct manager reports.
I was recently contacted by an even larger tech company about a role that is a first line manager position with no manager reports. On paper, it is clearly a step down in scope and responsibility, but the compensation is nearly double what I make now.
I am genuinely happy in my current role, and both companies have strong brand recognition.
The new position all in would pay close to 1m/year, but I feel uneasy about a few things. One concern is whether a role like this would be among the first to be cut if things went south.
Throughout my 20+ year career, I have consistently pushed myself into uncomfortable reports and often taken on more responsibility than my peers. That approach has paid off so far. I have never been laid off or fired, but on paper I look overextended compared to others at similar career stages.
Would you seriously consider making this move, even if it appears to be a step back career wise?
Without hesitation I would do it.
I work at one of those large companies and people at my level - mid manager - leave to smaller companies and become CTO or CIO or Director for half the pay. Why would I want to work twice as hard for half the pay? That’s just nuts. Plus people only leave this company when they are forced via layoffs.