Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 21:51     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Rocketship has never truly understood the DC families it serves. While it's a national charter, they cut their teeth in California - predominantly the San Jose region, with Hispanic families. They seemed to think they had a cookie cutter approach that could be applied anywhere, but DC's Ward 8 demographics weren't like anything they'd experienced up to that point. Not sure how their Tennessee and Texas expansions are doing.


Rocketship Infinity is by the Fort Totten metro, which is not doing well but not as badly as Rocketship's lowest-performing school EOTR. Just to run a quick comparison with a nearby DCPS LaSalle-Backus, LaSalle-Backus is doing way better-- quite impressive on some metrics such as MGP and CAPE scores. LaSalle-Backus actually has a *higher* rate of economically disadvantaged students. Friendship Ideal is a nearby similar charter (though only goes through 3rd) and also outperforms Rocketship Infinity despite having a higher percentage economically disadvantaged.

There are two Rocketship schools EOTR: Legacy and Rise. They're 2.4 miles apart by car, yet their performance is significantly different. Perhaps there's a reason for this, I dunno. DCPS school Anne Beers Elementary, which is roughly between the two Rocketships, is doing better than both.

I don't know what one could conclude from this other than Rocketship is an outlier. And I don't know if one or more Rocketship campus closes, how area schools are going to cope with an influx of children who have been so poorly served.


It's so strange that Legacy Prep is struggling now, as it was originally considered "the good one". Rise was the flagship, but Legacy had better facilities and better teachers. Infinity was a weird situation, in that they weren't really in a place for more expansion, but it was more of a real estate grab. A site became available, and they switched priorities. I know almost nothing about Infinity since it opened, but if Legacy is in danger, then Rise is most certainly in danger.


You seem so knowledgeable! I really don't know much, but it seems to me Legacy is struggling more than Rise at the moment. But Legacy has the most kids-- about 500. I'm not sure Rise can absorb that many.


So, I've got a philosophy on Rocketship that will make me not so "Anonymous" to folks who know me: Rocketship is basically a tech company masquerading as a charter school. It's based in San Francisco, in the same spaces as every other tech giant. The difference is that the "innovation" it's marketing is Education. When you work for them, it's like working for a startup. Insane expectations, and no work/life balance. The children and families are basically seen as consumers. And they have a bunch of technology that they swear will meet your children where they are, and have them above grade level in no time. Then, they'll award them some proprietary grades that don't mean anything outside their walls. When the kids transfer, the receiving schools don't know what to do with the transcripts. It looks really sleek on the surface, but there's very little substance underneath it all.



Spoken like a true Rocketship survivor!
Rocketship has no idea what’s it’s doing. They mistook all that year 1 tier 1 mess as a sign they were really doing something when in reality it was a mixture of opening with a small number of kids, teaching test skills, micromanaging any possible autonomy any teacher had, enthusiasm, and luck. There was no strategy. No sustainability. Just a rinse and repeat cycle with an insanely high turnover year after year.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 21:43     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Rocketship has never truly understood the DC families it serves. While it's a national charter, they cut their teeth in California - predominantly the San Jose region, with Hispanic families. They seemed to think they had a cookie cutter approach that could be applied anywhere, but DC's Ward 8 demographics weren't like anything they'd experienced up to that point. Not sure how their Tennessee and Texas expansions are doing.


Rocketship Infinity is by the Fort Totten metro, which is not doing well but not as badly as Rocketship's lowest-performing school EOTR. Just to run a quick comparison with a nearby DCPS LaSalle-Backus, LaSalle-Backus is doing way better-- quite impressive on some metrics such as MGP and CAPE scores. LaSalle-Backus actually has a *higher* rate of economically disadvantaged students. Friendship Ideal is a nearby similar charter (though only goes through 3rd) and also outperforms Rocketship Infinity despite having a higher percentage economically disadvantaged.

There are two Rocketship schools EOTR: Legacy and Rise. They're 2.4 miles apart by car, yet their performance is significantly different. Perhaps there's a reason for this, I dunno. DCPS school Anne Beers Elementary, which is roughly between the two Rocketships, is doing better than both.

I don't know what one could conclude from this other than Rocketship is an outlier. And I don't know if one or more Rocketship campus closes, how area schools are going to cope with an influx of children who have been so poorly served.


It's so strange that Legacy Prep is struggling now, as it was originally considered "the good one". Rise was the flagship, but Legacy had better facilities and better teachers. Infinity was a weird situation, in that they weren't really in a place for more expansion, but it was more of a real estate grab. A site became available, and they switched priorities. I know almost nothing about Infinity since it opened, but if Legacy is in danger, then Rise is most certainly in danger.


You seem so knowledgeable! I really don't know much, but it seems to me Legacy is struggling more than Rise at the moment. But Legacy has the most kids-- about 500. I'm not sure Rise can absorb that many.


So, I've got a philosophy on Rocketship that will make me not so "Anonymous" to folks who know me: Rocketship is basically a tech company masquerading as a charter school. It's based in San Francisco, in the same spaces as every other tech giant. The difference is that the "innovation" it's marketing is Education. When you work for them, it's like working for a startup. Insane expectations, and no work/life balance. The children and families are basically seen as consumers. And they have a bunch of technology that they swear will meet your children where they are, and have them above grade level in no time. Then, they'll award them some proprietary grades that don't mean anything outside their walls. When the kids transfer, the receiving schools don't know what to do with the transcripts. It looks really sleek on the surface, but there's very little substance underneath it all.


Fascinating. So what do you think the PCSB will do? And will Rocketship attempt to save face somehow by closing voluntarily as other schools have done? They're already on a SIP...
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 21:42     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Rocketship has never truly understood the DC families it serves. While it's a national charter, they cut their teeth in California - predominantly the San Jose region, with Hispanic families. They seemed to think they had a cookie cutter approach that could be applied anywhere, but DC's Ward 8 demographics weren't like anything they'd experienced up to that point. Not sure how their Tennessee and Texas expansions are doing.


Rocketship Infinity is by the Fort Totten metro, which is not doing well but not as badly as Rocketship's lowest-performing school EOTR. Just to run a quick comparison with a nearby DCPS LaSalle-Backus, LaSalle-Backus is doing way better-- quite impressive on some metrics such as MGP and CAPE scores. LaSalle-Backus actually has a *higher* rate of economically disadvantaged students. Friendship Ideal is a nearby similar charter (though only goes through 3rd) and also outperforms Rocketship Infinity despite having a higher percentage economically disadvantaged.

There are two Rocketship schools EOTR: Legacy and Rise. They're 2.4 miles apart by car, yet their performance is significantly different. Perhaps there's a reason for this, I dunno. DCPS school Anne Beers Elementary, which is roughly between the two Rocketships, is doing better than both.

I don't know what one could conclude from this other than Rocketship is an outlier. And I don't know if one or more Rocketship campus closes, how area schools are going to cope with an influx of children who have been so poorly served.


It's so strange that Legacy Prep is struggling now, as it was originally considered "the good one". Rise was the flagship, but Legacy had better facilities and better teachers. Infinity was a weird situation, in that they weren't really in a place for more expansion, but it was more of a real estate grab. A site became available, and they switched priorities. I know almost nothing about Infinity since it opened, but if Legacy is in danger, then Rise is most certainly in danger.


You seem so knowledgeable! I really don't know much, but it seems to me Legacy is struggling more than Rise at the moment. But Legacy has the most kids-- about 500. I'm not sure Rise can absorb that many.


So, I've got a philosophy on Rocketship that will make me not so "Anonymous" to folks who know me: Rocketship is basically a tech company masquerading as a charter school. It's based in San Francisco, in the same spaces as every other tech giant. The difference is that the "innovation" it's marketing is Education. When you work for them, it's like working for a startup. Insane expectations, and no work/life balance. The children and families are basically seen as consumers. And they have a bunch of technology that they swear will meet your children where they are, and have them above grade level in no time. Then, they'll award them some proprietary grades that don't mean anything outside their walls. When the kids transfer, the receiving schools don't know what to do with the transcripts. It looks really sleek on the surface, but there's very little substance underneath it all.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 21:28     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Rocketship has never truly understood the DC families it serves. While it's a national charter, they cut their teeth in California - predominantly the San Jose region, with Hispanic families. They seemed to think they had a cookie cutter approach that could be applied anywhere, but DC's Ward 8 demographics weren't like anything they'd experienced up to that point. Not sure how their Tennessee and Texas expansions are doing.


Rocketship Infinity is by the Fort Totten metro, which is not doing well but not as badly as Rocketship's lowest-performing school EOTR. Just to run a quick comparison with a nearby DCPS LaSalle-Backus, LaSalle-Backus is doing way better-- quite impressive on some metrics such as MGP and CAPE scores. LaSalle-Backus actually has a *higher* rate of economically disadvantaged students. Friendship Ideal is a nearby similar charter (though only goes through 3rd) and also outperforms Rocketship Infinity despite having a higher percentage economically disadvantaged.

There are two Rocketship schools EOTR: Legacy and Rise. They're 2.4 miles apart by car, yet their performance is significantly different. Perhaps there's a reason for this, I dunno. DCPS school Anne Beers Elementary, which is roughly between the two Rocketships, is doing better than both.

I don't know what one could conclude from this other than Rocketship is an outlier. And I don't know if one or more Rocketship campus closes, how area schools are going to cope with an influx of children who have been so poorly served.


It's so strange that Legacy Prep is struggling now, as it was originally considered "the good one". Rise was the flagship, but Legacy had better facilities and better teachers. Infinity was a weird situation, in that they weren't really in a place for more expansion, but it was more of a real estate grab. A site became available, and they switched priorities. I know almost nothing about Infinity since it opened, but if Legacy is in danger, then Rise is most certainly in danger.


You seem so knowledgeable! I really don't know much, but it seems to me Legacy is struggling more than Rise at the moment. But Legacy has the most kids-- about 500. I'm not sure Rise can absorb that many.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 21:20     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Rocketship has never truly understood the DC families it serves. While it's a national charter, they cut their teeth in California - predominantly the San Jose region, with Hispanic families. They seemed to think they had a cookie cutter approach that could be applied anywhere, but DC's Ward 8 demographics weren't like anything they'd experienced up to that point. Not sure how their Tennessee and Texas expansions are doing.


Rocketship Infinity is by the Fort Totten metro, which is not doing well but not as badly as Rocketship's lowest-performing school EOTR. Just to run a quick comparison with a nearby DCPS LaSalle-Backus, LaSalle-Backus is doing way better-- quite impressive on some metrics such as MGP and CAPE scores. LaSalle-Backus actually has a *higher* rate of economically disadvantaged students. Friendship Ideal is a nearby similar charter (though only goes through 3rd) and also outperforms Rocketship Infinity despite having a higher percentage economically disadvantaged.

There are two Rocketship schools EOTR: Legacy and Rise. They're 2.4 miles apart by car, yet their performance is significantly different. Perhaps there's a reason for this, I dunno. DCPS school Anne Beers Elementary, which is roughly between the two Rocketships, is doing better than both.

I don't know what one could conclude from this other than Rocketship is an outlier. And I don't know if one or more Rocketship campus closes, how area schools are going to cope with an influx of children who have been so poorly served.


It's so strange that Legacy Prep is struggling now, as it was originally considered "the good one". Rise was the flagship, but Legacy had better facilities and better teachers. Infinity was a weird situation, in that they weren't really in a place for more expansion, but it was more of a real estate grab. A site became available, and they switched priorities. I know almost nothing about Infinity since it opened, but if Legacy is in danger, then Rise is most certainly in danger.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 20:35     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Anonymous wrote:Rocketship has never truly understood the DC families it serves. While it's a national charter, they cut their teeth in California - predominantly the San Jose region, with Hispanic families. They seemed to think they had a cookie cutter approach that could be applied anywhere, but DC's Ward 8 demographics weren't like anything they'd experienced up to that point. Not sure how their Tennessee and Texas expansions are doing.


Rocketship Infinity is by the Fort Totten metro, which is not doing well but not as badly as Rocketship's lowest-performing school EOTR. Just to run a quick comparison with a nearby DCPS LaSalle-Backus, LaSalle-Backus is doing way better-- quite impressive on some metrics such as MGP and CAPE scores. LaSalle-Backus actually has a *higher* rate of economically disadvantaged students. Friendship Ideal is a nearby similar charter (though only goes through 3rd) and also outperforms Rocketship Infinity despite having a higher percentage economically disadvantaged.

There are two Rocketship schools EOTR: Legacy and Rise. They're 2.4 miles apart by car, yet their performance is significantly different. Perhaps there's a reason for this, I dunno. DCPS school Anne Beers Elementary, which is roughly between the two Rocketships, is doing better than both.

I don't know what one could conclude from this other than Rocketship is an outlier. And I don't know if one or more Rocketship campus closes, how area schools are going to cope with an influx of children who have been so poorly served.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 19:29     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Rocketship has never truly understood the DC families it serves. While it's a national charter, they cut their teeth in California - predominantly the San Jose region, with Hispanic families. They seemed to think they had a cookie cutter approach that could be applied anywhere, but DC's Ward 8 demographics weren't like anything they'd experienced up to that point. Not sure how their Tennessee and Texas expansions are doing.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 18:39     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone comment about what the changes to the PCSB might mean for these upcoming reviews/votes? I heard that the Board may be down to a handful of voting members.


I think they hope to have at least one new member before the January meeting.

Schools will either be closed, or get conditions to improve. And then if they don't, maybe be closed or maybe get extensions-- the PCSB has a bad habit of giving extensions and flexibility and alternatives and grace periods and basically watering down their own standards because they hate closing schools.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 17:31     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Can anyone comment about what the changes to the PCSB might mean for these upcoming reviews/votes? I heard that the Board may be down to a handful of voting members.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 17:13     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

I'm sad about Thurgood. It served our family well. However, I don't think it recovered after the pandemic. I was in the building last spring and most of the veteran teachers and administrators who steered it before are gone.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 16:43     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://dcpcsb.org/notice-charter-review-multiple-schools-learn-dc-pcs-rocketship-pcs-thurgood-marshall-pcs

Rocketship is clearly in trouble. Its three campuses all have low scores and declining enrollment. Legacy Prep is the most troubled. I would not be surprised if it was folded into a different Rocketship location. Embarrassing for a large and experienced charter operator to be failing here.

LEARN and Thurgood Marshall seem to be doing okay enough to pass, as far as I can tell. Since the PCSB is trying to front-load potential closures in advance of the lottery, I guess SSMA and maybe SEED are the only schools this year in serious trouble.


I am a bit familiar with Rocketship, and I don't think they are doing anything particularly 'wrong', I just think they are feeling the effects of the (in my opinion) irresponsible and uncoordinated charter explosion/DCPS school consolidation mess that was 2000s-2010s. Too many schools/seats often concentrated in the same neighborhoods, fewer kids enrolling, etc. Glad to see they are curbing growth of schools a bit, and are being a bit more strategic about things.


You may be right about the mess that was the 2000s-2010s but Rocketship is experiencing some unique challenges. They are seriously underperforming charters (and DCPS) with the same demographics and have lost significant enrollment (like 25% over the last few years). Re-enrollment is really low at a couple of their campuses.


Totally this. I agree that loss of student population is a problem and authorization decisions by the PCSB were irresponsible and short-sighted, but it seems like Rocketship is failing while other similar schools are not. It's a case of when the tide goes out you see who's not wearing pants.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 16:39     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

The earlier the reviews are by the PCSB, the more in-trouble schools seem to be. The January reviews for SEED and Shining Stars followed by the February reviews for Rocketship and Thurgood suggest that not all is well. There may not be closures but could be conditions.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 16:36     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://dcpcsb.org/notice-charter-review-multiple-schools-learn-dc-pcs-rocketship-pcs-thurgood-marshall-pcs

Rocketship is clearly in trouble. Its three campuses all have low scores and declining enrollment. Legacy Prep is the most troubled. I would not be surprised if it was folded into a different Rocketship location. Embarrassing for a large and experienced charter operator to be failing here.

LEARN and Thurgood Marshall seem to be doing okay enough to pass, as far as I can tell. Since the PCSB is trying to front-load potential closures in advance of the lottery, I guess SSMA and maybe SEED are the only schools this year in serious trouble.


I am a bit familiar with Rocketship, and I don't think they are doing anything particularly 'wrong', I just think they are feeling the effects of the (in my opinion) irresponsible and uncoordinated charter explosion/DCPS school consolidation mess that was 2000s-2010s. Too many schools/seats often concentrated in the same neighborhoods, fewer kids enrolling, etc. Glad to see they are curbing growth of schools a bit, and are being a bit more strategic about things.


You may be right about the mess that was the 2000s-2010s but Rocketship is experiencing some unique challenges. They are seriously underperforming charters (and DCPS) with the same demographics and have lost significant enrollment (like 25% over the last few years). Re-enrollment is really low at a couple of their campuses.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 15:33     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

Anonymous wrote:https://dcpcsb.org/notice-charter-review-multiple-schools-learn-dc-pcs-rocketship-pcs-thurgood-marshall-pcs

Rocketship is clearly in trouble. Its three campuses all have low scores and declining enrollment. Legacy Prep is the most troubled. I would not be surprised if it was folded into a different Rocketship location. Embarrassing for a large and experienced charter operator to be failing here.

LEARN and Thurgood Marshall seem to be doing okay enough to pass, as far as I can tell. Since the PCSB is trying to front-load potential closures in advance of the lottery, I guess SSMA and maybe SEED are the only schools this year in serious trouble.


I am a bit familiar with Rocketship, and I don't think they are doing anything particularly 'wrong', I just think they are feeling the effects of the (in my opinion) irresponsible and uncoordinated charter explosion/DCPS school consolidation mess that was 2000s-2010s. Too many schools/seats often concentrated in the same neighborhoods, fewer kids enrolling, etc. Glad to see they are curbing growth of schools a bit, and are being a bit more strategic about things.
Anonymous
Post 01/08/2026 13:46     Subject: Charter reviews scheduled for Feb 23: LEARN, Rocketship, Thurgood Marshall

https://dcpcsb.org/notice-charter-review-multiple-schools-learn-dc-pcs-rocketship-pcs-thurgood-marshall-pcs

Rocketship is clearly in trouble. Its three campuses all have low scores and declining enrollment. Legacy Prep is the most troubled. I would not be surprised if it was folded into a different Rocketship location. Embarrassing for a large and experienced charter operator to be failing here.

LEARN and Thurgood Marshall seem to be doing okay enough to pass, as far as I can tell. Since the PCSB is trying to front-load potential closures in advance of the lottery, I guess SSMA and maybe SEED are the only schools this year in serious trouble.