Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He sounds mentally rigid, OP. How frustrating.
Totally. I think his rigidity and way of thinking have isolated him from other kinds of socializing so everything is getting dumped in DC.
Hmm. Do you think he's on the spectrum?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He sounds mentally rigid, OP. How frustrating.
Totally. I think his rigidity and way of thinking have isolated him from other kinds of socializing so everything is getting dumped in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has nothing to do with his relationship to the kid. It's his relationship with you and the need to "win" and own "his time."
Even if this is stuff happening outside of “his time”?. He seems to think that if DC has time with me that DC spends doing extracurriculars or going to sleepovers that this should instead be time for them to be together and “bond”. It’s so weird. I don’t know a 12 year old who wants to just sit around with their dad and I don’t know where he got the idea that this is how it should work.
Anonymous wrote:So to answer the time above, he has visitation and I have legal custody. I know the terms vary by state but it means DC is with me more time, and this is for specific reasons that have to do with bad things STBX did. STBX is not complaining about things that impact his time but rather how DC is spending their time when they’re not with him. It is not impacting his visitation time.
Anonymous wrote:He sounds mentally rigid, OP. How frustrating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So to answer the time above, he has visitation and I have legal custody. I know the terms vary by state but it means DC is with me more time, and this is for specific reasons that have to do with bad things STBX did. STBX is not complaining about things that impact his time but rather how DC is spending their time when they’re not with him. It is not impacting his visitation time.
I wrote the PP above.
I was in a similar situation to yours. I had full custody and full decision making, and he had limited supervised visitation.
He has no right to make decisions about what happens on your time. I agree 100% that he's trying to control you.
But his time needs to be seen as a commitment, with a substitute time offered if there's something that really can't be rescheduled.
To reiterate: I’m not touching his time. He just thinks that if there is “more free time” then DC should “be there for his dad.” It feels really messed up.
I get that.
If my ex had done that, I know his motivation would have been to avoid me being home alone, with free time that I could use to date. I wasn't dating at that point, I was recovering from an abusive relationship, but he was convinced I was and kept making ridiculous accusations. His goal wouldn't really have been to get the kid, it would have been for me to cancel the playdate, practice etc . . . and keep the kid home where he could supervise.
I would be very clear. What happens on your time is your decision, but you will continue to prioritize his time with the kid(s). I realize that his time isn't the issue, but I'd want those words in the messages so that they can't be used against you in court.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So to answer the time above, he has visitation and I have legal custody. I know the terms vary by state but it means DC is with me more time, and this is for specific reasons that have to do with bad things STBX did. STBX is not complaining about things that impact his time but rather how DC is spending their time when they’re not with him. It is not impacting his visitation time.
I wrote the PP above.
I was in a similar situation to yours. I had full custody and full decision making, and he had limited supervised visitation.
He has no right to make decisions about what happens on your time. I agree 100% that he's trying to control you.
But his time needs to be seen as a commitment, with a substitute time offered if there's something that really can't be rescheduled.
To reiterate: I’m not touching his time. He just thinks that if there is “more free time” then DC should “be there for his dad.” It feels really messed up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So to answer the time above, he has visitation and I have legal custody. I know the terms vary by state but it means DC is with me more time, and this is for specific reasons that have to do with bad things STBX did. STBX is not complaining about things that impact his time but rather how DC is spending their time when they’re not with him. It is not impacting his visitation time.
I wrote the PP above.
I was in a similar situation to yours. I had full custody and full decision making, and he had limited supervised visitation.
He has no right to make decisions about what happens on your time. I agree 100% that he's trying to control you.
But his time needs to be seen as a commitment, with a substitute time offered if there's something that really can't be rescheduled.
Anonymous wrote:So to answer the time above, he has visitation and I have legal custody. I know the terms vary by state but it means DC is with me more time, and this is for specific reasons that have to do with bad things STBX did. STBX is not complaining about things that impact his time but rather how DC is spending their time when they’re not with him. It is not impacting his visitation time.
Anonymous wrote:Has nothing to do with his relationship to the kid. It's his relationship with you and the need to "win" and own "his time."